Users Online Now:
2,084
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,899,596
Pageviews Today:
2,631,908
Threads Today:
642
Posts Today:
12,264
08:12 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Is CW Leonis in our Backyard? Elenin/Nibiru researchers... Read this!
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Practically ET:MV8xNTc5Nzc2X0U5NUQwQ0E4] CW LEONIS – Why it may not be what is claimed. http://endgametime.wordpress.com/cw-leonis-why-it-may-not-be-what-is-claimed/ - - - - - - - - - - - - Quite a few more inconsistencies when it come to the Famous CW Leonis: Here's the data on that point found searching CW Leonis: http://server5.sky-map.org/starview?object_type=2&object_id=159228 Principal Galaxy Catalog PGC1427054 is a dim galaxy northwest of Regulus, well-known and cataloged - not CW Leonis, someone has their data wrong on this site Another CW Leonis representation: IRC +10216 Here is the wiki (120–150 pc): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CW_Leonis We know it is moving through the Interstellar Medium: http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.4997 1968 observation of IRC +10216: http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1970ApJ...162L..15H/L000018.000.html ... 290 parsecs - 945.4 light years away this was the commonly used figure for about 10 years or so In the 80's most research used a figure of ~200 parsecs http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1985ApJ...299..424S/0000438.000.html and this continued into the 90's This Article from 1999 puts the distance to IRC +10216 at around 200 parsecs or 652 light years: http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/mmw/mmwlab/websitepdf/76.pdf Then in the late 90's to 2000's it was 100-150 parsecs (note, in the transition both new lower and higher older number might be used) This article from 2000 put it at 130 parsecs - 423 light years: http://www.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/staff/amenshchikov/Preprints/IRC+10216.pdf This article : http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2001/ast11jul_1/ ... from 2001 put's CW Leonis at 500 light years away 130 pc - 423 http://www.asiaa.sinica.edu.tw/~hasegawa/p4v30col2apj.pdf 150 parsecs - 1998 http://www.nasa-academy.org/soffen/travelgrant/tenenbaum.pdf In early 2000's lower numbers became the norm for pc distance. Looking through many papers researching CW Leonis, have noticed that distance numbers have steadily decreased over the last 2 decades from 300 parsecs to closer to 100 parsecs. I don't know how big the shell is on this thing, but if it truly was at 120 parsecs in 2000 and moving 100 parsecs a decade, where would that put it now? At our front door. If you don't believe me, go do a google search on 'distance to IRC +10216'. You also will see the creep towards us. [/quote]
Original Message
CW LEONIS – Why it may not be what is claimed.
[
link to endgametime.wordpress.com
]
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Quite a few more inconsistencies when it come to the Famous CW Leonis:
Here's the data on that point found searching CW Leonis:
[
link to server5.sky-map.org
]
Principal Galaxy Catalog
PGC1427054 is a dim galaxy northwest of Regulus, well-known and cataloged - not CW Leonis, someone has their data wrong on this site
Another CW Leonis representation: IRC +10216
Here is the wiki (120–150 pc):
[
link to en.wikipedia.org
]
We know it is moving through the Interstellar Medium:
[
link to arxiv.org
]
1968 observation of IRC +10216: [
link to articles.adsabs.harvard.edu
] ...
290 parsecs - 945.4 light years away this was the commonly used figure for about 10 years or so
In the 80's most research used a figure of ~200 parsecs
[
link to articles.adsabs.harvard.edu
]
and this continued into the 90's
This Article from 1999 puts the distance to IRC +10216 at around 200 parsecs or 652 light years:
[
link to www.cfa.harvard.edu
]
Then in the late 90's to 2000's it was 100-150 parsecs (note, in the transition both new lower and higher older number might be used)
This article from 2000 put it at 130 parsecs - 423 light years:
[
link to www.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
]
This article : [
link to science.nasa.gov
] ...
from 2001 put's CW Leonis at 500 light years away
130 pc - 423
[
link to www.asiaa.sinica.edu.tw
]
150 parsecs - 1998
[
link to www.nasa-academy.org
]
In early 2000's lower numbers became the norm for pc distance.
Looking through many papers researching CW Leonis, have noticed that distance numbers have steadily decreased over the last 2 decades from 300 parsecs to closer to 100 parsecs. I don't know how big the shell is on this thing, but if it truly was at 120 parsecs in 2000 and moving 100 parsecs a decade, where would that put it now? At our front door. If you don't believe me, go do a google search on 'distance to IRC +10216'. You also will see the creep towards us.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>