Users Online Now:
2,324
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,422,918
Pageviews Today:
2,053,047
Threads Today:
571
Posts Today:
11,097
04:42 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 14143765:MV8xOTU0OTkxXzMyODM5NzM2XzI3OTQ5MDNE] [quote:Skeptic the First:MV8xOTU0OTkxXzMyODMxNDQ2X0FGMjc5MDRD] [quote:Anonymous Coward 14143765:MV8xOTU0OTkxXzMyODE5MjA0XzlFQkMzMzU5] IF it was compartmentalized as you say, then everybody else involved designed, built and tested equipment capable of going to the Moon. So why not go? [/quote] Your logic is faulty on two counts. 1) The #1 difference between reality and fakery is that reality would have risked the lives of the celebrity "astronauts." Even if NASA had had equipment [i]theoretically [/i]capable of carrying humans to the moon and back, President Nixon (of mass-murdering Vietnam War infamy) could not take the political chance of another celebrity multi-death "accident"--it would have entirely killed the space program, on which the military-industrial-intelligence complex had come to depend.[/quote] BS. They knew the risks. You can't claim to know the mind of a dead president. [quote:Skeptic the First:MV8xOTU0OTkxXzMyODMxNDQ2X0FGMjc5MDRD] 2) Compartmentalization does not mean that [i]all [/i]of the components were fit for purpose; but rather, that those working on the fit-for-purpose components would be unaware of the inadequacies of other components. [/quote] So now you want even more people in on it that have never said a word. you can't have it both ways. [quote:Skeptic the First:MV8xOTU0OTkxXzMyODMxNDQ2X0FGMjc5MDRD] The most obvious candidate for an unfit component was the Lunar Module (LM). The very idea that one might risk human lives on a contraption that had never been tested in the entirely alien environment in which it was supposed to operate is utterly ludicrous to any engineer who is not a mass murderer himself.[/quote] Never tested? They tested the components on the ground, they tested the assembled vehicle in orbit unmanned then manned then manned in lunar orbit. Apollo 11 was the final test and you are still full of BS. [quote:Skeptic the First:MV8xOTU0OTkxXzMyODMxNDQ2X0FGMjc5MDRD] [b]The United States has [i]never [/i]sent a mammal beyond near-earth orbit, returned it to earth, and verified its good health[/b]--again, unless you count the "moon landings." Not before 1969, and not since. [/quote] Why would they need to? They can and did test the radiation environment with sensors. They KNEW what the environment was like. [/quote]
Original Message
My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
In the video 6min 20 secs interview
General Walters dies, at 85, in the night after a French interview that was going to expose details about the first moon walk, it was scheduled for the next day he did not survive the night.
6min 20 secs into video
[
link to mountzion144.ning.com
] share_post
Listen to what the New York Herald tribune says in the video. More
[
link to thebodyofjesusthenazoraion.com
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>