REPLY TO THREAD
|
Subject
|
Canada sneakily Includes Provision for Depositor Confiscated Bail-Ins of Large Canadian Banks in its 2013 Budget
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
Pin this shit! Damit!
"...From Page 144:
“The Government also recognizes the need to manage the risks associated with systemically important banks—those banks whose distress or failure could cause a disruption to the financial system and, in turn, negative impacts on the economy. This requires strong prudential oversight and a robust set of options for resolving these institutions without the use of taxpayer funds, in the unlikely event that one becomes non-viable.”
Translated, Without the use of taxpayer funds means via depositor funds.
And the meat of the provision, from Page 145:
The Government proposes to implement a bail-in regime for systemically important banks. This regime will be designed to ensure that, in the unlikely event that a systemically important bank depletes its capital, the bank can be recapitalized and returned to viability through the very rapid conversion of certain bank liabilities into regulatory capital. This will reduce risks for taxpayers. The Government will consult stakeholders on how best to implement a bail-in regime in Canada. Implementation timelines will allow for a smooth transition for affected institutions, investors and other market participants…"
The bail-in provision in Canada’s 2013 budget can be found on pages 144,145: www.budget.gc.ca/2013/doc/plan/budget2013-eng.pdf
rest of the story at SD
h/t Doc,
[link to www.silverdoctors.com]
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Next Page >> |
|