Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,771 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 551,640
Pageviews Today: 857,529Threads Today: 342Posts Today: 4,577
09:33 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject COMET C2012/S1 ISON : COMA/TAIL OF OVER 64,400 KM [UPDATE]
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message
alright guys I measured it and heres what I got ..
[link to www.nasa.gov]

the arc minute on the SWIFT image was 60 mm [millimeters] and the comet itself [nucleus, no coma] was 9 mm

so its one arc second per milimeter or 9 arc seconds

so using this NASA MATH DONE ON COMET ENCKE

[link to docs.google.com (secure)]

THEY CONCLUDE..[im posting this so you can check mymath too :)]

problem 5
. the comet in the math lesson was 114 million KM away and at that distance each arc minute was 33,000 km

so here it states on the NASA article
[link to www.sen.com]


Swift's observations in January were made at a distance of 604 million kilometres (375 million miles) from Earth

??cross mutiply??

114,000,000 604,000,000
--- ---
33,000 x

or 19932000000000 = 114,000,000 [X]


X = 174842.10526315789473684210526316 KM PER ARC MINUTE AND I MEASURED IT FROM THE PHOTO AT 9 MM OUT OF 60


so at .15 arc minute we get a maximum measured value of

174,842 [times] 0.15

to get a whopping 26226.315789473684210526315789465

or an apparent measured diameter of

26,226 KM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


OK DID I DO IT RIGHT...measured it onscreen with my Silva ranger!!!


so comet diameter of 26,226 km !!!!!!

or 5km in the article ?


if i made a mistake please point it out..
 Quoting: rphunter


ALRIGHT
just for comparison I remeasured it so heres the other calcs...

8 mm = 23312.280701754385964912280701747 or 23,312 KM

7 MM = 20398.245614035087719298245614028 OR 20,398 KM

6 MM = 17484.21052631578947368421052631 OR 17,484 KM

WHAT DOES IT MEASURE TO YOU?

ALSO DR VAN FLANDERN [NAVAL OBSERVATORY] HAD A EQUATION THAT ROUGHLY DEFINES TEH SPHERE OF INFLUENCE OF AN OBJECT IN SPACE WHICH IS THE DIAMETER IN KM , TIMES THE DISTANCE FROM THE SUN IN A.U. SO TAKE
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

604,000,000 KM [DIVIDED BY ] AU = 149,597,870.700 km

= 4.0374906218501410795815558356072 OR 4.03 A.U. [TIMES] 23,312 KM WOULD GIVE A COMPANION CAPABLE "SPHERE OF INFLUENCE " [CAN HOLD LESSER MASSES IN ORBIT WITHIN A SPHERE OF ] 94121.981376570488847205229639676 OR A SPHERE OF DIAMETER 94,121 KM AT MAXIMUM
 Quoting: rphunter


I have double checked your calcs and they are on. You are not the first to make these and come to the same conclusion. I used the same standardized and accepted method to conclude the coma of NEAT was roughly slightly larger than Earth before it began producing a coma and I was flamed by over two dozen shills simultaneously on this forum and at least 30 on Phil Plaits "BAD ASStronomy" forum. i was subsequently banned , apparently for proving my point and proving them all lairs..

Couple that with NASA's own insistence that ISON is not producing a coma and the conclusion is this is the approximate actual diameter of the object.
 Quoting: Anonymous astrophysicst1350433
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP