Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,341 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 271,082
Pageviews Today: 361,191Threads Today: 105Posts Today: 1,631
03:05 AM

Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
Subject Is 100,000 Litres Too Small A Spill To Report? -- Manitoba's Dark, Oily Secret
User Name
Font color:  Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message It oozed oil for a confirmed 10 days, or a rumoured 30, depending on the source. But the oil spill, one of the provinceís largest, went unnoticed by most media outlets. Upwards of 100,000 litres, approx., 500 barrels, of oil spilled out a broken underground flow line near the Manitoba-Saskatchewan border, covering an area equivalent in size to two football fields a half mile from Carlyle Jorgensenís farmland and mere metres from Jackson Creek in an area of the province known to house many rare plant and animal species. The leak is reported to have started end of January of this year. The Brandon Sun was the only major news source to cover the spill. Sun reporter Graeme Bruce broke his usual silence and gave other media, Spectator Tribune, the information it needed to start investigating the story, in the interest of getting the word out.

It seems a newly-proposed national pipeline and Albertaís recent bout with controversy have wrested attention from the events happening in our own backyard. What other excuse is there for the secrecy? Is 100,000 litres of spilled oil too small to report?

[link to spectatortribune.com]
Pictures (click to insert)
 | Next Page >>