|
REPLY TO THREAD
|
|
Subject
|
London Machete Terror Attack False Flag 'Blood on the Hands'
|
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
Fals Flag Definitly: [link to eyreinternational.wordpress.com]
It just so happened that on the 20th of this month prince William & Harry opened a new "Help For Heroes" center. In addition they called for increased public support for the cause.
Obviously the psychological seed was well and truly planted with that little gem. Could it be a startling coincidence the victim was a serving soldier was wearing a "Help For Heroes" t-shirt as reported by the MSM?
Media "sources" describe the men shouting "allahu akbar" whilst performing their dastardly deeds. No eyewitnesses can confirm this at this time.
Currently their are two versions of the black gent with the knifes giving his rather eloquent speech doing the rounds, the first I saw was what appears to be the original shows him without blood stained hands, the second with what appears to be a woeful attempt at blood covering his hands and weapons. There is some suggestion that the quality of the footage and colour depth could account for the discrepancy in both videos. Personally I'm not convinced.
The obvious lack of blood upon the guys clothing including his white soled shoes. There are no bloodied footprints to be found anywhere upon the crime scene. Also there are anomalies regarding the blood surrounding the crashed car and it's lack of appearance in later pictures (both sets of pictures are post mortem). If this was indeed a frenzied, maniacal attack would we not see at least some arterial spray/blood upon the assailant?
The three women surrounding the headless corpse, walking around casually. Shock? It's a possibility, but all three women in such close proximity to such a ghastly scene and no reactions of grief, shock, distress? Is it a fair assumption that you would want to distance yourself from the victim?
The apparent lack of concern from the surrounding public watching these men hacking this guy up? Not one person attempted to fight them off, no attempt was made to do anything apart from film the incident post mortem. There is at this point no footage showing the act being committed ( can you believe that in this day and age with the availability of phones)
Who was the balls of steel camera man who stood still and filmed the six foot black guy walking towards him with bloodied hands and cleaver in hand? Would you be stood there at that precise moment in time capturing his words for posterity?
Ingrid Loyan Kenett the heroine of the hour ..... categorically stating that the attackers were not under the influence of drugs, drink or any other substance. Very similar to the guy after the world trade centers were hit offering his "theory" regarding the jet fuel melting the internal structures.
Waiting for the armed response to turn up and hanging around the crime scene for twenty minutes? Is that consistent with a jihadist? What hasn't made it's way into the public arena yet is the attempted shot one of the guys tried to get off at the police. I saw on Twitter yesterday a guy stating that they had an old rusty .45 on them and it backfired on him. This is a tried and tested method of the patsy set up, arming them with fake or dysfunctional equipment. Admittedly it's spurious at best but it is very consistent with their methods of operation.
Additional links: BBC website Woolwich attack: Footage shows man with bloodied hands [link to www.bbc.co.uk]
Former British prime minister confirms media manipulation of government
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
David Cameron: 'Attack will only make us stronger'
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
**prejudice special** BBC Sucks O Cocks News
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
Was the London killing of a British soldier 'terrorism'?
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
|
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | | Next Page >> |
|
