Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,571 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,305,718
Pageviews Today: 1,863,636Threads Today: 516Posts Today: 9,847
03:09 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject Aspartame declared safe by EFSA but how safe are EFSA? pseudo-science more like!
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message In light of the recent revelation by EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) that Aspartame is safe..

[link to www.bbc.co.uk]

I thought I'd take a closer look at EFSA and their shady dealings..

Many of the "scientists" that work for EFSA also have direct or indirect links to companies that profit hugely from Aspartame and other sweeteners such as Coca Cola, Monsanto (who manufacture Aspartame), Nestle, Kraft, Unilever etc...

Here is an article that written by Dr. Herman Koeter, who was the head of EFSA, but resigned out of conscience when he saw how much corruption was involved in the organisation and the Aspartame study.

[link to drleonardcoldwell.com]

Here is another article on the conflicts of interests involved in EFSA.

[link to www.anh-europe.org]

Basically, This study is like asking the Mafia to do an "independent" study to find out if the Mafia it's self is corrupt!

People that conducted the Aspartame study make billions of pounds every year out of the sale of Aspartame for the companies they also have ties with.

Can you see where the corruption and pure conflict of interest arises from??

Here is a quick video about EFSA.

[link to www.youtube.com]

So thanks for showing me this but there are literally thousands and thousands of independent studies that completely disagree with EFSA corrupt findings.. The difference is that they have no financial ties to the sweetener industry.

Is it better to trust hundreds of thousands of testimonies from people directly affected by Sweeteners or one study created by the very people that profit from the industry?
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP