Users Online Now:
1,061
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
166,304
Pageviews Today:
257,446
Threads Today:
102
Posts Today:
1,467
02:53 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Moon Landing hoax? Debunking the Debunkers?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:BeSkeptical:MV8yODY1NjdfNzYzNDU1NzVfQjBCRTdCMEM=] 1) The one making the claim bears the burden of providing sufficient evidence. 2) Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. 3) NASA's claim that "we went to the Moon and returned safely, six times, without a single fatality" is by far the most extraordinary claim in the history of science. It therefore requires a similarly monumental level of totally irrefutable evidence. 4) The scientist's standard of proof is [i]independent reproducibility[/i]. Some independent party, using the same methods and apparatus, must produce the same results. In re the "Moon landings," this means that another entity, not in any way beholden to NASA or the United States, must get to the Moon and back safely using the same rocket, computer, space suits, etc. 5) The historian's standard of proof is [i]independent confirmation[/i]. Some honest independent party must irrefutably verify the claim. In re the "Moon landings," this means that another entity, not in any way beholden to NASA or the United States, and of known honesty, must verify that humans reached the Moon, walked around there, and returned safely. 6) The judge's standard of proof is the [i]testimony, under oath and cross-examination, of multiple honest witnesses[/i]. In re the "Moon landings," this means that the astronauts, engineers, and NASA executives must all testify under oath to their extraordinary claim, with cross-examination by knowledgeable skeptics. 7) NASA has not met any of these standards of proof--not even the last, which is the simplest: Putting the astronauts, engineers, and executives under oath and submitting them to cross-examination by skeptics. It is now too late, of course--too many of them have died, including Neil Armstrong. [/quote]
Original Message
In an effort to be fair minded, and seeking the truth...check out:-
[
link to www.badastronomy.com
]
Personally i still have my doubts.
-especially after bart sabrell's video.
[
link to video.google.com
]
What do you all think?
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>