Users Online Now:
2,497
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,958,179
Pageviews Today:
2,715,025
Threads Today:
662
Posts Today:
12,769
08:44 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Supreme Court Has To Go - Refuses to hear challenge on "assault weapon" ban
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 70983956:MV8zMDI3NzQ5XzUzNzIxOTQzXzYzMUM0NDI5] [quote:TrumpsRedHat:MV8zMDI3NzQ5XzUzNzIxNjAwXzk1MjU5N0FB] [quote:ItsAllOneBigLie:MV8zMDI3NzQ5XzUzNzIxNTY0X0M2NTQ0QTZD] "[b]If a ban on semi automatic guns and large capacity magazines reduces the perceived risk from a mass shooting and makes the public feel safer as a result, that’s a substantial benefit,[/b]" Judge Frank Easterbrook, who was appointed to the appeals court by President Ronald Reagan, wrote. [/b]" [/quote] The PERCEIVED risk?! So even by admission, it has no factual basis for being this way. Just if the public feels it will. [/quote] It's almost a 100% certainty that this Judge Easterbrook character is a feelingstard, libtard Democrat! [/quote]
Original Message
So the supreme kangaroo court will humor same sex marriage which is no where in the constitution but will completely ignore an infringement on the second amendment?
[
link to www.usatoday.com
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>