REPLY TO THREAD
|
Subject
|
Difference between "gross negligence" and "extreme carelessness"?
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
Difference between "gross negligence" and "extreme carelessness"?
COMEY said: "our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.
Then he went on to say that "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information" (i.e. gross negligence);
Then "seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation" (i.e. knowingly removing classified information);
The only thing he said she did NOT do, was mishandling this information "intentionally". Even then, not sure how setting up an unsecure server is unintentional...
It's like, here is the law, here is how she actually broke the law ("there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information", and then says that no charges will be recommended. Why?
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Next Page >> |
|