Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 2,798 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 497,814
Pageviews Today: 1,565,017	Threads Today: 1,028	Posts Today: 16,114
03:59 PM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject CIA Analyst – Trump Wiretap Was Probably Done Via British GCHQ, 1534

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 73755729:MV8zNDY5NDY0XzYyMDQ2OTUzX0VFNTc4MkQ3]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 74370540:MV8zNDY5NDY0XzYxOTA2NzI4X0RGM0QwRDA3]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 74241807:MV8zNDY5NDY0XzYxODk0NTIxX0M5MjAxODky]
Explains why British papers were the first to report on the secret  FISA warrants--- this reporting could have been an early misdirection intended to embarrass Trump.

Of course if the Brits did it at Obama's request,  this means that Obama is shielded legally.

I was wondering how the British got the FISA scoop first...well they didn't...
[/quote]

Obama is not shielded if the content of the wire taps were given him during daily intel briefing. He is still spying on his political adversary during a campaign regardless. The CIA subcontracted the wire tapping. Shouldn't make a difference.
[/quote]

Good point-- but it would have to be proven --- and a conversation in  the daily briefing might be difficult to prove if there is no paper trail or record of the conversation.

The British could have agreed to do surveillance on Trump Tower  on the basis of an informal conversation with an Obama subordinate-- and if so---  there would be no record or paper trail.

Plausible deniability is what these guys do.
[/quote]

Original Message The plot thickens....

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>