Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,622 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 697,484
Pageviews Today: 1,130,523Threads Today: 349Posts Today: 6,242
11:39 AM

Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
Subject Can Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's 'tortured' testimony be trusted?
User Name
Font color:  Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message [link to rawstory.com]

Matt Lauer: Can Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's 'tortured' testimony be trusted?
David Edwards and Ron Brynaert
Published: Thursday March 15, 2007
Print This Email This

On Thursday, NBC's Today Show explored whether the confessions of alleged 9/11 "mastermind" Khalid Sheikh Mohammed can be trusted, since he claimed to have been tortured after being detained.

"Let's talk about the issue of torture," NBC's Matt Lauer said. "He says in his statement that he didn't make this statement under duress or pressure, but he does also say that he was tortured by the CIA after his capture."

Last September, CIA sources told ABC News that the harshest technique they were authorized to use on "high-value detainees, such as the 9/11 attacks architect Khalid Sheikh Mohamed...was called 'water boarding,' in which a prisoner's face was covered with cellophane, and water is poured over it (pictured above) -- meant to trigger an unbearable gag reflex."

Brian Ross and Richard Esposito reported for ABC's The Blotter that "new rules issued by the Pentagon today prohibit water boarding, though there was no clear acknowledgement that it was permitted previously," and that "CIA officers told ABC News that 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed lasted the longest under water boarding, two and a half minutes, before beginning to talk."

Lauer notes that "this is a subject" that he discussed during a September of 2006 interview with President Bush, in which he asked, "I mean, if, in fact, there was water boarding used with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and for the viewers, thatís basically when you strap someone to a board and you make them feel as if theyíre going to drown by putting them underwater, if that was legal and within the law, why couldnít you do it at Guantanamo? Why did you have to go to a secret location around the world?"

"Iím not going to talk about techniques," Bush responded to Lauer in September. "And, Iím not going explain to the enemy what weíre doing. All Iím telling you is that youíve asked me whether or not weíre doing things to protect the American people, and I want the American people to know we are doing so."

Lauer wondered "how credible" was "the laundry list of targets" named by Mohammed, if they were named after he had been water boarded: "Won't you kind of spew out all kinds of locations just to make it stop?"

NBC News terrorism analyst Roger Cressey said that's always a concern when "rather invasive techniques" are used.

The following video clip is from NBC's Today Show.
Pictures (click to insert)
 | Next Page >>