Users Online Now:
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
The McCain was fully disabled and not moving when the merchant oil tanker hit it 100% proof !
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 75418306:MV8zNjEyNjA1XzY0NDg1NDUxX0U2NEJERTdC] [quote:Anonymous Coward 73146648:MV8zNjEyNjA1XzY0NDg1MzA2XzE3QTkxOA==] [quote:Anonymous Coward 55743029:MV8zNjEyNjA1XzY0NDg0OTc2X0ZBN0RERDZD] [quote:Anonymous Coward 75418306:MV8zNjEyNjA1XzY0NDg0OTcxXzY0MTk0OENG] [quote:Anonymous Coward 75315389:MV8zNjEyNjA1XzY0NDgyOTI1XzNCNjgyNzRG] Sounds like "Someone" has the ability to render The US Navy Totally Helpless whenever they want and plow a boat into any vessel they choose to neutralize. The implications are terrifying for Naval Warfare. What if it works on planes too? [/quote] That has already been experimented with a long time ago [/quote] maybe we should just surrender now [/quote] I found out about this technology about 3 years ago, before the USS Donald Cook fiasco. The Russians had it at that time because they sponsored and then paid for it from the inventor. I have no knowledge about Chinese involvement in this, but obviously they now have it too. Both the Fitzgerald and this ship were victims of advanced electromagnetic tech. When I first discovered it, it was then advertised as capable of stopping a Thermonuclear ICBM, causing it to be "inert!" Supposedly, it was available to the US then as well as China. Back then it was reported that both refused to buy on to it. The origin was an Iranian scientist. By the way, not only was the USS Donald Cook stopped dead in the water in the Black Sea in 2005, but the same US Naval ship was also stopped dead in Feb 2016 in the Baltic sea. During that encounter the media reported that a Russian aircraft buzzed the ship and the Media asked why the Navy didn't shoot it down. The reply was that the plane was presenting no threat, just flying low sending a signal. They NEVER reported or admitted that once again the Cook was "dead in the water" which one could easily see on Media video. When they panned across the stern while following the aircraft there was NO WAKE! The Cook was obviously not moving and therefore was likely incapable of defending itself or firing on the Russia A/C. My concern is not that Russia and maybe China have this tech, but why did the US allow TWO SUCCESSFUL ATTACKS ON THE USS COOK AND NOW ON TWO MORE DESTROYERS OF THE SAME CLASS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE GLOBE! INSANE! If I could find out about this new tech, anybody could. Oh! maybe not the Navy! [/quote] Buddy, this has been used already in WW2 [/quote]
From that pic you can tell the McCain was dead in the water. There is no shear damage from a ship under power. It was a direct hit ! The McCain would have been under full power to get out of the way of a ship that was 4 times it's size. It was also full daylight as far as I know. No shear no power. Look at where the "V" shaped part of the haul hit the war ship. Not one inch of shear.
Look at the photo:
link to twitter.com (secure)
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2020 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.027s (5 queries)