Users Online Now:
2,238
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,088,531
Pageviews Today:
1,966,564
Threads Today:
874
Posts Today:
15,132
10:13 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
My 2¢ on the capture of UK soldiers
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Shadow:MV8zNjI4OTRfNTg5MjY2MF83MzM1RUQ4Mg==] [quote:SHR] Countries like Canada that do dick and enjoy the security afforded them due to geographical co-incidence because nations like America and Britain do what needs to be done as far as global security is concerned, while they sit on their asses and do little else than bitch and moan about it. Four canoes and a box of muskets is easy and cheap to maintain when you live next door to the worlds strongest superpower, wanna trade responsibilities? We've been doing the heavy lifting for awhile now. [/quote] Now why would you go and make a completely unresearched knee-jerk statement like that? Canada has always paid her share for defense of the US. [/quote]
Original Message
How often has Bush used this (kidnap, beheading) distraction to shut up political and/or social opposition against more defense spending? How much opposition is Blair facing over £76 billion for updating UK Trident missiles? How much opposition will Blair face tomorrow?
Who benefits? Who
always allways
benefits?
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>