Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,952 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 877,335
Pageviews Today: 1,506,173Threads Today: 599Posts Today: 10,937
04:43 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject Humans, most likely did not evolve on earth
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message We are most likely migrants from another system.

Forbidden Archeology:

MIchael Cremo, in the introduction to "The Hidden History of the Human Race", elaborates:

Over the past two centuries researchers have found bones and artifacts showing that people like ourselves existed on earth millions of years ago. But the scientific establishment has suppressed, ignored, or forgotten these remarkable facts. Why? Because they contradict the now dominant view of human origins, which holds that humans like ourselves evolved within the past 100,000 years from more apelike ancestors. The Hidden History of the Human Race, a book sure to ignite controversy, brings these paradigm-breaking discoveries to light. Deploying an unexpectedly great number of convincing facts, deeply illuminated with critical analysis, Cremo and Thompson challenge us to rethink our understanding of human origins, identity, and destiny.

In Part I of "The Hidden History of the Human Race", we look closely at the vast amount of controversial evidence that contradicts current ideas about human evolution. We recount in detail how this evidence has been systematically suppressed, ignored, or forgotten, even though it is qualitatively (and quantitatively) equivalent to the evidence favoring currently accepted views on human origins. When we speak of suppression of evidence, we are not referring to scientific conspirators carrying out a satanic plot to deceive the public. Instead, we are talking about an ongoing social process of knowledge filtration that appears quite innocuous but has a substantial cumulative effect. Certain categories of evidence simply disappear from view, in our opinion unjustifiably. This pattern of data suppression has been going on for a long time.

[link to www.blavatsky.net]

________________________________________________________

Almost all scientists believe that evolution is a fact -- that species evolved over a long period of time. Only about 5% of all scientists argue for the creation of all present-day species (and of all the species seen only in fossils) in one week, about 4000 to 8000 BCE. This small minority of scientists are almost entirely Evangelical Christians who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible, literally interpreted. Among those scientists who specialize in biology or geology, the percentage of believers in creation of a young earth drops to less than 1%.

Many dozens of "proofs" that evolution never happened have been put forth by creation scientists. These indicators have been well circulated among scientists; all have been easily refuted by them. If such a proof existed, it would be the discovery of the century! It would disprove the entire structure of evolution -- of the earth itself, of its life forms and of the rest of the universe. This structure has been laboriously pieced together over more than a century. Any scientist who was able to disprove evolution would be a shoo-in for the next Nobel Prize, and would receive world-wide fame. It seems obvious that very few scientists could resist such fame and economic rewards; he or she would publish an article immediately and wait by the phone for the Nobel Prize committee to call. But, although tens or hundreds of thousands of scientists are familiar with these "proofs" by creation scientists, no scientist has ever come forward and published a proof in a peer-reviewed journal.

We receive many E-mails which contain "proofs" that evolution is a false theory. After investigation, all seem to be based on misunderstandings of generally accepted scientific beliefs. If you believe that you have one, please Email us.

All of the "proofs" listed below are paraphrased from the original Emails.


Some indicators:
Human footprints found inside of dinosaur footprints
Evolution has never been observed
Evolution would cause all land animals to be like giraffes
Growth rate of human societies
Pre-human fossils
Neanderthals didn't exist
Cro-Magnon vs. Homo Sapiens brain capacity
Fossils of extinct proto-humans
Long "extinct" Agraptalyte fish found
Transitional species missing from the fossil record
Survival of previous species
The genome cannot increase in complexity; microevolution vs. macroevolution
Organic material cannot come from inorganic; thus evolution could not have started up.
Second law of thermodynamics:
Missing geological column
Inter-species mating
Missing proof

[link to www.religioustolerance.org]
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP