Users Online Now:
913
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
224,805
Pageviews Today:
365,879
Threads Today:
114
Posts Today:
2,186
04:50 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:plzxplain:MV8zODg0ODk0XzY5OTg3OTA0X0FCMDQ5M0E=] [quote:Muscles:MV8zODg0ODk0XzY5OTg3Njk2XzNFMjBENDYy] [quote:Harry The Dog:MV8zODg0ODk0XzY5OTg2Mjk0XzZGOUI3QUY3] And my largest frustration in any debate is how the subject matter gets framed. Darwin's book was titled "The Origin Of Species." He postulated that evolution within a species somehow leads to THE CREATION OF NEW SPECIES. Over time we have all accepted that EVOLUTION is real. AND IT IS! Humans in sunny, hot environments are very different from humans in cold, sun-starved environments. Evolution within species is undeniable; however, evolution as a means of explaining origins of new species is ludicrous. [/quote] Evolution within species is not called Evolution it's called adaptation meaning that the human being is still a human and always will be a human it doesn't change into another species. Instead it is written in the Human genome to have the abiñity to adapt to different environmemtal conditions as a means of protección. [b]if I were to go to a hotter climate in Africa[/b] my skin would darken but I would still be a human and a part of the human family the DNA is a code whatever it says you are you are. [/quote] You would 'adapt' [i]Adaptation refers to the process wherein certain groups or individuals change their ways in order to be better suited to their environment and habitat. This is change is needed so that they can survive and maintain normal functioning in their community. For example, during winters or cold days, individuals learn to alter their homes and personal clothes to be able to live through the chilling temperatures.[/i] Read more: Difference Between Adaptation and Evolution | Difference Between http://www.differencebetween.net/science/nature/difference-between-adaptation-and-evolution/#ixzz5N5yS88QE Over a very long period of time, your bloodline would 'evolve' : Evolution, though, takes a long time. It is a process in which the [b]genetic structure and physical anatomy[/b] change in relation to the changes happening in the environment. It does not occur overnight, but invokes generations in order to turn out into the best being suitable. Human beings are indeed an example, as evidenced [b]from our ancestors the Homo erectus, to Homo sapiens, or basically, us. We are the proof of evolution.[/b] Hers another example, your nose lol it will eventually change [b]genetically[/b], become broader https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/how-climate-changed-shape-your-nose-180962567/ [/quote]
Original Message
500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
snip....
"As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact."
[
link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>