Users Online Now:
2,038
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,751,236
Pageviews Today:
2,573,897
Threads Today:
698
Posts Today:
14,557
08:59 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:ToSeek:MV8zODg0ODk0XzY5OTkwMDU0X0Q4QTE5N0Y5] [quote:seadog 36:MV8zODg0ODk0XzY5OTg2NzcxXzg3Qjk2MTFE] [quote:Expose ALL Shills:MV8zODg0ODk0XzY5OTg2MjA1X0M5NUVGMTI4] The religion of evolution is losing members fast. Praise God [/quote] where is the list of the 500 Scientists who Reject Darwin's Theory/ [/quote] Here (PDF download): http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=660 If you see the names of any scientists sufficiently "renowned" that you recognize them, please let me know. [/quote]
Original Message
500+ Renowned Scientists Jointly Share Why They Reject Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
snip....
"As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require — or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have — or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life — the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact."
[
link to www.collective-evolution.com (secure)
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>