Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 2,768 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 1,969,108
Pageviews Today: 2,730,894	Threads Today: 665	Posts Today: 12,861
08:51 PM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject Why has Dianne Feinstein not been censured for withholding evidence during Kavanaugh's hearing?

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

Original Message Seems to me that she should be formally censured for withholding evidence throughout the long hearings and then using it as a disruption after the fact.

If she believed that this letter would change the course of the Kavanaugh hearings, why did she withhold it? And why is the Senate taking this without a complaint?

She sits on the Senate Judiciary committee and did not disclose the contents of this letter to her fellow members. Later, when it is too late, she brings up this vague and strange letter.

Either she should have entered it into discussion during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, or she should have ignored it as too vague, too silly (no date, no year, no location, and not possible to validate), and moved on.

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>