Users Online Now:
1,586
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
141,063
Pageviews Today:
191,266
Threads Today:
51
Posts Today:
820
01:37 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Scientists Baffled-New Discoveries-Darwinian Evolution Crumbling-Scientists Abandon Theory
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Spur-Man:MV8zOTM2MzAxXzcxMjE1ODc1XzdCQzY5NTFE] [quote:musashi777:MV8zOTM2MzAxXzcxMjA5Nzc5X0U5QTA4MDM=] [quote:Spur-Man:MV8zOTM2MzAxXzcxMTg5MzM2XzRCQTQ0MTI1] [quote:musashi777:MV8zOTM2MzAxXzcxMTg4NDIxXzcxMjg5NDI3] Common designer not common ancestor. [youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4SKl8qtNSY[/youtube] [/quote] I knew you watched Kent Hovind. I watch Kent Hovind a lot. For fun. The man is a charlatan. I feel sorry for his followers. You really shouldn't look to him as an authority on science. Can you explain why you think the common ancestry hypothesis does not predict that the ancestors of horses had multiple toes? You said it doesn't. [/quote] I like a lot of what kent hovind has to say but I am not a follower of any human. The only charlatan is the evolutionary theory and those who follow it. [/quote] Hovind makes laughably stupid claims and says things he knows are wrong, even when he's been corrected dozens of times. He did 9 years for tax evasion, even though Jesus said to render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's. You have no evidence that evolution theory and those who follow it are charlatans. I didn't even know a theory could be a charlatan. [quote:musashi777:MV8zOTM2MzAxXzcxMjA5Nzc5X0U5QTA4MDM=]Here's is an amazing experiment and challenge: separate the liberal atheist heathens and the hard working conservative Christian community, and see what happens. Oh wait we already did that its called san Francisco. [/quote] We're meant to be talking about evolution, but if you want to get personal, ok. You can thank atheists for your computer and half the inventions you use. Alan Turing, Bill gates, Steve jobs, Tesla, Einstein... none of them believed in your god. Scientists when compared to the general public are disproportionately atheist, and statistics indicate that secular countries with a higher percentage of atheists have less crime than your country. [quote:musashi777:MV8zOTM2MzAxXzcxMjA5Nzc5X0U5QTA4MDM=] I think that the progenitor of equines had within its genetics, a vast array of potential, just as we see in other species. [/quote] A vast array of potential? Every animal has a single genetic code, and that code evolves across generations. A wolf doesn't contain the genes to make a pug, the pug genes appeared over multiple generations. There is no detectable limit that would prevent different taxonomic families from evolving from a common ancestor. [quote:musashi777:MV8zOTM2MzAxXzcxMjA5Nzc5X0U5QTA4MDM=]The only reason odd-toed ungulates are within the same category is because that is how we classified them. Because a horse has a single hoof they classified it with the other members of the order Perissodactyla. [/quote] Wrong. We classify them that way because of their anatomy and DNA. The other Perissodactyla have multiple toes. That is why the common ancestry model suggests that the ancestors of equines had multiple toes, as the fossil record supports. [quote:musashi777:MV8zOTM2MzAxXzcxMjA5Nzc5X0U5QTA4MDM=]Do you think that a puddle with bubbles, getting struck by lightning could "accidently" produce life???? [/quote] No. But it's a fact that amino acids can be created when minerals and gas are exposed to electricity. It is also a fact that self replicating RNA can naturally assemble from raw materials. [/quote]
Original Message
The discovery of tyrannosaurus soft tissue is enough to cost this scientist her job. The implications are that the infamous dinosaur can be no older than several thousand years, twelve thousand max. This significant discovery should be enough to at least cause a revision of natural history. interview of scientist who found the soft tissue begins at 1:25 by 60 Minutes.
At 25 minutes they speak pertaining to the blood vessels found in these "fossils".
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>