Users Online Now:
1,909
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
690,939
Pageviews Today:
911,559
Threads Today:
248
Posts Today:
3,639
07:56 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
NASA Admits THAT APOLLO NEVER WENT TO THE MOON 50 YEARS AGO. SHOCKING OFFICIAL VIDEO DISCLOSES ALL
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:LHP598:MV8zOTUwODgxXzcxNDM3NzUyXzQ5MkU4Q0Q3] [quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTUwODgxXzcxNDM3NjE1X0IyRTRCNjQ3] [quote:LHP598:MV8zOTUwODgxXzcxNDM3MDg4XzE5MUEwRDAx] [quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTUwODgxXzcxNDM2NzQ3Xzk4RTMyRTdD] [quote:LHP598:MV8zOTUwODgxXzcxNDMyODIwX0Q0RTNDQzMz] [quote:BremertonHardcorePunk:MV8zOTUwODgxXzcxNDMyMzYwX0JDREFFNkQ2] [quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTUwODgxXzcxNDI5Nzc4XzQ2NzI1OUM4] [quote:BremertonHardcorePunk:MV8zOTUwODgxXzcxNDI1OTk2XzdGMDFDQkYz] [youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7_R1Lj0BV0[/youtube] [/quote] This is an interesting video. 1. Go to 1:30 in it. 2. Then look at the picture - spot anything missing? What is missing is The Moon. Where has it gone? If the moon was a 50 yard cube I'd accept that picture, but it's a great big thing, bigger even than a football field. So why can't we see it? [/quote] Yeah, why is it totally smooth in at 1:30, but earlier we see detailed craters, etc? I guess that is weird unless there was a sand dune on the moon looking the other direction. The only way to know is for one of us GLPers to personally go to the moon, and come back and tell us as a witness. Then we could believe. [/quote] different angle and lighting. craters are less visible in the part at 1:30 as the light is from behind the camera and we don't see the shadowed part of the crater. [/quote] Different lighting? How? did they screw a different sun in? Isn't the sun was this really big bright thing in space? [/quote] Learn to read. I explained it in the post that the sun is from a different direction. The camera has been moved between the two different shots being discussed. [/quote] Actually you said 'different angle and lighting'. The photo may be from a different angle but the lighting must the same, even between the beginning and end of the mission the suns angle didn't change that much.[/quote] since the camera is not pointing the same direction then the angle of lighting relative to the camera is different. One is from the side and one is from behind. Perhaps I should have said "of" instead of "and" but I bet most people can still understand what was meant. But it could be argued that the lighting conditions are different as well as the camera is in the sun when it is was lit from the side and in the shadow when lit from behind. Thus there would be exposure differences. [quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTUwODgxXzcxNDM3NjE1X0IyRTRCNjQ3] But hey, can you explain [u]what angle of the sun will cause the nearby ground to be clearly lit but the other few million hectares and horizon to completely disappear?[/u] [/quote] That is a DIFFERENT question than what I answered. Again, learn to read. There is a horizon in the asked about photo so I'm not sure why you think it "disappeared". With the low resolution and detail I'm not sure how you can tell there are a "few million hectares" missing. If you think there is not enough land showing it could be because of terrain, ie the edge of a crater or hill is making the horizon appear closer. But it is not really clear what you mean. [/quote]
Original Message
UPDATE: Since I never expected the response to my original post about the Chinese Moon Rover to be so great, and the topic naturally turned to the alarming facts arising of whether the Apollo mission in the summer of 1969 was a "hoax" or not, I decided to re-head this thread with an actual, OFFICIAL N.A.S.A. ("Never.A.Straight.Answer") VIDEO which PROVES we never went to the moon. Their project "Orion" to Mars with humans aboard will 'have to solve the problems of the Van Allen Belts..before we can send humans to Mars'...
How the F did they go to the friggin MOON almost 50 yrs ago then?
===============================================
ORIGINAL POST:
The horizon line and the smaller curvature of the moon is well defined, MUCH different than any of the apollo mission photos, which they couldn't fake on a soundstage with fake backdrop photos.
Here's just one photo:
[
link to www.forbes.com (secure)
]
WE MIGHT HAVE GONE TO THE MOON ALREADY, JUST NOT VIA APOLLO MISSIONS, WHICH WERE P.R. STUNTS.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>