Users Online Now:
2,129
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
442,040
Pageviews Today:
712,048
Threads Today:
240
Posts Today:
3,721
08:45 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODI0NzM5XzlGREY3M0Mx] [quote:LHP598:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODIzMzc1XzY4REI2QThC] the Apollo spacecraft also had polyethylene as part of its insulation for that purpose. Quantify it. Prove it was too much for the short time they went. Bet you can't. X-ray operators would be exposed to far more than a "few" even in a week if they didn't retreat. Failed analogy from you. So prove the amount of x-rays the film was exposed to should have been too much. And there were none directed at Earth DURING a mission. [/quote] So you think they also used polyethylene on Apollo too? If you know then NASA also know - right? So you've just proven that NASA didn't lose any radiation shielding tech. used on Apollo: Congratulations. Funny they are still working on it. Why do you think that is? BTW Geo-stationary satellites are proof that electronics are not an issue for space travel: it proves the hurdles are purely biological. Then you want me to prove that the radiation was low enough for them all to be fine, after I've just explained that it wasn't. Nice try, but it's NASA's job to prove they did it, not mine. Maybe they could prove that by going above LEO - but they never do. That's a proof that they cannot. However NASA have stated that they only got a few 'chest X-rays' worth of radiation, but that is then enough to fog film. Your response is that you want me to prove a chest Xray fogs film, that's easy, just pop into your local hospital and look at a chest X-ray. Duh. Enjoy arguing with the radiologists. Your odd comment that there were no CME's/flares from the Sun directed toward earth during a mission is both irrelevant and meaningless, well done. Many people survive russian roulette for similar reasons. Know any astronauts who have played? So apart from some general noise, [b]Have you got even a single bit of proof for Apollo that you can share here? Just ONE thing that proves they went? [/b] [/quote]
Original Message
Shouldn't they have gradually lifted the model to simulate rocket thrust rather than blowing it up with explosives, and throw some dust under it?
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>