Users Online Now:
2,186
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,186,542
Pageviews Today:
1,615,419
Threads Today:
417
Posts Today:
6,746
12:58 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:LHP598:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODI1MTU3XzkyMENFMjk3] [quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODI1MDcyX0QxOTIxRUFE] [quote:LHP598:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODI0ODU4X0I1REVBM0VD] Since Apollo went around the belts and for interplanetary trips they'll have to go through them, the problems are partially biological. Geo-stationary satellites have extra shielding already and live in a part of the belts further out. They are not shielded for all parts. [/quote] There is no way around the belts from the trajectory used for Apollo. Duh. The only way 'around' them is on the polar axis.[/quote] Incorrect. [quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODI1MDcyX0QxOTIxRUFE] [quote:LHP598:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODI0ODU4X0I1REVBM0VD] Please read. I asked you to prove it was too much. [/quote] Please read. It is NASA's job to prove they went.[/quote] So instead of acknowledging your reading error, you instead shift the burden of proof. [quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODI1MDcyX0QxOTIxRUFE] [quote:LHP598:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODI0ODU4X0I1REVBM0VD] Since they don't currently have a heavy lifting rocket, how would they get to the Moon or anywhere else? [/quote] Err - this isn't my fault. That's NASA's job. A better question is WHY haven't they developed a heavy lifting rocket in 50 years?[/quote] NASA doesn't build rockets. They hire contractors to do so. Contractors like to get paid. Congress hasn't put forward the money to do so. [quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODI1MDcyX0QxOTIxRUFE] [quote:LHP598:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODI0ODU4X0I1REVBM0VD] Again, learn to read. Prove the film got that much radiation. [/quote] Again, learn to read. Just pop into your local hospital and look at a chest X-ray. Duh. Enjoy arguing with the radiologists.[/quote] so you can't prove the film got that much. Got it. Or do you think the film was just left out just kicking around all the time? [quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODI1MDcyX0QxOTIxRUFE] [quote:LHP598:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODI0ODU4X0I1REVBM0VD] [quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODI0NzM5XzlGREY3M0Mx] So apart from some general noise, [b]Have you got even a single bit of proof for Apollo that you can share here? Just ONE thing that proves they went? [/b] [/quote] shifting the burden of proof already? Not a single hoax claim stands up to scrutiny. but thanks for the humor. [/quote] Shifting the burden of proof already? Not a single piece of evidence from NASA stands up to scrutiny. but thanks for the humor.[/quote] There is tons of evidence. All internally and externally consistent. But the real question is what would you actually accept? [quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODI1MDcyX0QxOTIxRUFE] NASA: PROVE you went to the moon with Apollo. You can't. [/quote] I'm not NASA and they have. Fixed your quotes by the way. [/quote]
Original Message
Shouldn't they have gradually lifted the model to simulate rocket thrust rather than blowing it up with explosives, and throw some dust under it?
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>