Users Online Now:
2,070
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
2,254,243
Pageviews Today:
3,132,763
Threads Today:
737
Posts Today:
14,819
11:35 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 77354202:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODM0OTU1X0Y3Q0Q5Q0Q2] [quote:DGN:MV8zOTY5MzM0X0I5MEJGOEJF] Shouldn't they have gradually lifted the model to simulate rocket thrust rather than blowing it up with explosives, and throw some dust under it? [youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpQ3AbHL2SM[/youtube] [/quote] A few years back I remember seeing a photo from either the Chinese or Russians taken by a lunar orbiting satellite that showed one of the lunar landing sites and you could see the tracks from the rover on the moon. You'd think it there was nothing to see at the landing sites they would have definitely mentioned that. Nevermind. It was NASA who released the pics. https://www.space.com/12835-nasa-apollo-moon-landing-sites-photos-lro.html [/quote]
Original Message
Shouldn't they have gradually lifted the model to simulate rocket thrust rather than blowing it up with explosives, and throw some dust under it?
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>