Users Online Now:
1,422
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
413,570
Pageviews Today:
535,591
Threads Today:
168
Posts Today:
1,915
04:42 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Which do you enjoy more, NASA forgetting to rake out the LEM landing blast crater, or the exploding, no thrust no dust take off?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:DGN:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODQ4MDkyXzMyM0IxRTVF] [quote:LHP598:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODQ3NjE2X0ExNjEzQ0FC] [quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODQ2NjA4X0U3N0U0Nzg4] [quote:hotdogg:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODQ2NTA2XzI4MEQ0RDY=] [quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODQ2Mjc2XzQ4OEU1NDk0] [quote:hotdogg:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODQ2MjI5X0E1NDZCRDQw] so what are the objects sitting on the surface of the Moon where the 6 landings purportedly happened? ...seen by foreign countries satellites? [/quote] We've been through this before: there is NO independent confirmation. You yourself have proven this by failing to provide any images, even fake ones. There's no evidence of ANY objects on the moon from Apollo, apart from NASA's LRO CGI of the tracks and impossible flags. [/quote] prove the images are fake/CGI...your claim, your burden of proof...present your evidence... [/quote] Yes of course, here is one proof: NASA claims that the radiation exposure was equivalent to a few 'chest X-rays'. A single 'chest X-ray' fogs film, destroying the deep blacks. But ALL of the Apollo images have PERFECT blacks. Therefore according to NASA they faked all the images. QED! [/quote] I looked and could only find it quoted as equal to an x-ray but even if your citationless statement is correct, was this film just kicking around the cabin the whole time or stored in other containers that would have provided more shielding? [quote:Drone#6:MV8zOTY5MzM0XzcxODQ2MzU3X0M3RDZDQjc=] It doesn't even matter about the geometrically impossible NASA claim that they flew 'around' the belt. [/quote] Nobody has claimed they bypassed the belts entirely. They took an inclined trajectory that took them around the thicker center parts avoiding the most intense regions. Not impossible. and not misplaced like DGN likes to lie about. [youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuH4rxda3Z4[/youtube] [youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4gSRy1tHls[/youtube] [/quote] This is what, NASA's 40 year old Apollo radar tracking, or a color pencil drawing, like evolutionist drawing little creatures mutating [i]upwards[/i] into bigger ones, with no intelligent rewrite of the DNA assembly blueprints? [/quote]
Original Message
Shouldn't they have gradually lifted the model to simulate rocket thrust rather than blowing it up with explosives, and throw some dust under it?
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>