|
REPLY TO THREAD
|
|
Subject
|
The Earths upper mantle and Core are destabilizing *updated*
|
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
The gamma ray burst that have been reported here.
[link to sosrff.tsu.ru]
and here
[link to earthboppin.net]
are not gamma ray burst, I believe they are coming from the core itself and from the weakened magnetosphere,
"If the Earth’s core is being stimulated by cosmic rays into emitting neutral matter in analogous manner to a Coronal Mass Ejection by the sun, is there any evidence of this occurring? The most compelling sign would be if the Earth’s core, like the sun, was observed to be emitting cosmic rays. Indeed, this has occurred with cosmic ray detectors discovering cosmic rays coming out of the Earth, rather than penetrating into it.
Cosmic rays observed to be coming out of Antarctica were first detected in January 2007 when the Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA) balloon experiment began, as explained by the science writer, Emma Fiala:
Using sensors, ANITA began detecting high energy neutrinos interacting with the ice sheet below….During ANITA’s time in the Antarctic, it detected never before seen “upward-pointing cosmic-ray-like events.” The rays detected had horizontal planes of polarization, which may suggest they didn’t originate in space.
Cosmic rays coming out of the Antarctic ice sheets were observed again by ANITA in December 2016 and sparked intense scientific speculation over whether a new type of particle had been discovered. This led to a team of scientists at Penn State University studying the ANITA data, and on September 25, 2018, releasing released their report about the anomalous 2007 and 2016 events which was published on the scholarly archive, arxiv.org:"
The Schumann Resonance measures the low frequency (ELF) portion of the Earth's electromagnetic field. Schumann resonances are global electromagnetic resonances, generated and excited by lightning discharges in the cavity formed by the Earth's surface and the ionosphere. The planet has a normal steady frequency of 7.83 Hz.
On January 31st, 2017, for the first time in recorded history, the Schumann Resonance spiked to frequencies of 36+ Hz. It was considered an anomaly when in 2014 this frequency rose from its usual 7.83 Hz to somewhere in the 15-25 Hz levels—so a jump from 7.83 Hz to 36+ Hz is a big deal. That’s more than a five-fold increase in resonant frequency levels. On April 24, 2017 it set another record spike of 60 Hz. It has since then been regularly spiking into these ranges and higher.
the deep crustal earthquakes that we have been seeing ,may indicate that the core is becoming destabilizied.
Date: 17th Feb 2019 02:35 PM
Continent: Indonesian Archipelago
Country: Papua New Guinea
Location: Rabaul, East New Britain
Magnitude: 6.4
Depth: 367.93 km
Date: 17th Feb 2019 10:07 AM
Continent: Pacific Ocean - East
Country: Fiji
Location: Suva, Central
Magnitude: 4.6
Depth: 614.34 km
Meanwhile on the other side of the planet on the Mid Atlantic Ridge 180 degrees from the 6.4 we see this.
Date: 17th Feb 2019 11:29 AM
Continent: South-America
Country: Falkland Islands
Location: Stanley,
Magnitude: 5.0
Depth: 10 km
And Now just a few hours later
Date: 17th Feb 2019 11:19 PM
Continent: South-America
Country: Falkland Islands
Location: Stanley,
Magnitude: 5.4
Depth: 106 km
These are the type of earthquakes that make me think the Caribbean plate is destabilizing deep down
Date: 16th Feb 2019 01:04 AM
Continent: Caribean Sea
Country: British Virgin Islands
Location: Road Town,
Magnitude: 3.2
Depth: 100 km
Date: 16th Feb 2019 01:04 AM
Continent: Middle-America
Country: Costa Rica
Location: Rio Segundo, AlaNOPEla
Magnitude: 3.3
Depth: 88 km
[link to www.sciencedaily.com (secure)]
New research shows that a big earthquake can not only cause other quakes, but large ones, and on the opposite side of the Earth....
….The higher the magnitude, the more likely a quake is to trigger another quake. Higher-magnitude quakes, which have been happening with more frequency in recent years, also seem to be triggered more often than lower-magnitude ones.
A tremblor is most likely to induce another quake within 30 degrees of the original quake's antipode -- the point directly opposite it on the other side of the globe
[less than 50%]
[link to www.thoughtco.com (secure)]
Deep Earthquake Details
There are a few more significant clues about deep-focus events. One is that the ruptures proceed very slowly, less than half the speed of shallow ruptures, and they seem to consist of patches or closely spaced subevents. Another is that they have few aftershocks, only one-tenth as many as shallow quakes do. They relieve more stress; that is, the stress drop is generally much larger for deep than shallow events.
Until recently the consensus candidate for the energy of very deep quakes was the phase change from olivine to olivine-spinel, or transformational faulting. The idea was that little lenses of olivine-spinel would form, gradually expand and eventually connect in a sheet. Olivine-spinel is softer than olivine, therefore the stress would find an avenue of sudden release along those sheets. Layers of melted rock might form to lubricate the action, similar to superfaults in the lithosphere, the shock might trigger more transformational faulting, and the quake would slowly grow.
[less than 50%]
|
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | | Next Page >> |
|
