Users Online Now:
2,112
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,537,815
Pageviews Today:
2,554,661
Threads Today:
1,023
Posts Today:
18,133
11:46 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Now It Can Be Told - Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster Investigation
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 6540724:MV80MDAzODM1XzcyNDc1NjcwXzYyOUQ1QjFG] [quote:darth:MV80MDAzODM1XzcyNDc1MzQ5XzM2QTc3Mjkz] [quote:Anonymous Coward 76338311:MV80MDAzODM1XzcyNDc0ODQ2XzEyRjFFNzg2] [quote:Dukster:MV80MDAzODM1XzcyNDc0Nzg3X0MyMUZERjIx] [quote:darth:MV80MDAzODM1XzcyNDc0Njg4XzUzNjJBODg3] OK, I watched enough. I am a retired aerospace engineer. I worked most of my career in Downey, CA at the company that was the prime contractor for the Shuttle. I was proud of Rocco Petrone, our Division General Manager, when I found out that he told NASA that morning of the launch, "IT IS A BIG MISTAKE TO LAUNCH THE BIRD AT 25F WHEN THERE ARE 6 FOOT ICICLES HANGING OFF OF IT!" To imagine Rocco, he was West Point Class of 1939, a football player, and hard as nails. Imagine the Godfather but in better physical condition, a very intimidating man. I, like everyone else, believed the accident commission findings that the O rings failed allowing the burn through. Then, in 1999, I met an engineer who worked for United Technologies at the time of the accident. When he heard that the commission would report that the O rings were at fault, he went to Rogers, the head of the Commission. He explained that on a previous launch, one of the SRBs (Solid Rocket Boosters) had a hard landing in the Atlantic. They disassembled the SRB and Thiokol refurbished the sections in Utah. When they tried to reassemble the SRB sections, one was bent out of round. IIRC, the segments are held together by 1" bolts on 4" centers. An engineer suggested plugging the holes that did not line up and drilling NEW holes in the middle for the bolts. The NASA Supervisor got a $10,000 award for saving money by not scrapping the damaged SRB segment. They did NOT perform a structural analysis of the weakened joint. Upon pressurization of the SRB, that section ripped apart like a perforated sheet of paper. You can see the puff of smoke on the launch video from the tear. The flame hit the attach assembly and weakened it like a cutting torch. They hit a wind shear and the SRB broke off. The engineer reporting the new holes was told, "But we already had a press conference blaming the O rings. NASA would lose credibility if we change our findings. Dr. Feynman and other notables would be embarrassed". The story did not change. YES, we knew that the astronauts were alive but badly injured until they hit the ocean at 600 MPH. The Crew Cabin on the Shuttle was built like a brick shithouse, a marvelous tribute to the welders and craftsmen of the United Auto Workers (yep, they built the Shuttle in Downey). The fuel from the External Tank detonated like a small nuke and the Crew Cabin survived intact. I also know why we lost Shuttle Columbia. I was in the meeting when we told NASA that the leading edge of the wing on Columbia had become dangerously weak, so weak you could punch a hole in it with your finger. As far as I know, it was not replaced because the money in the budget was not there. The ice that hit the wing and knocked a hole in it was a well known danger. What is not generally known is that NASA started using an inferior adhesive to hold the foam on the External Tank. The original, excellent adhesive used fluorocarbons and someone at the EPA thought it would destroy the ozone layer. So, what have we learned? NEVER trust the government or MSM. And the EPA is a bunch of idiot greens. BTW, the drawings showing the modified SRB were deep sixed immediately. No evidence. No one talked. [/quote] wow this is disturbing. i worked at hamilton standard when it was a part of utc. i never heard anyone question the o-ring theory. [/quote] And this right here is what makes GLP priceless and why I will always keep coming back hoping for the days of old and just had a sweet taste of nostalgia [/quote] People should always question the official story. BTW, TWA 800 was shot down by a pair of OUR missiles that were being tested. They were launched from a sub. The 747 was 4000 feet below assigned altitude. A tragic accident, but covered up by the craven MSM to protect Prez Clinton. Not that it was HIS fault. The Prez is never informed about Black World testing. It was a stupid mistake by a program manager. They also lied to protect the Black World. There are plenty of leftist pols and civil servants who would love to attack our most secret programs. THAT I can understand. How do I know this? I was briefed way back before the tests ever took place. [/quote] My brother was on virginia beach and saw the missile launch on flight 800.he was working for a radio tower company up there at the time and bored,so went to the beach that night just to chill out. As for the oring story,holy crap! In radio tower construction,some times i had to add braces to increase ice load strength to them.any guy with a drill and bolts knows you dont do what nasa did.thats wack! Ty op for the thread! [/quote]
Original Message
NASA LIARS & SCUMBAGS
[
link to www.youtube.com (secure)
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>