Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,279 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 21,839
Pageviews Today: 34,817	Threads Today: 14	Posts Today: 215
12:22 AM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject I took one of them online tube-type I.Q. tester thingybobs.

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

Original Message .... it was fast timed in each section and I had to manually input my answers.. but I'm on a little tablet and diddy botched one or two bits and pieces.

Despite that (and no accounting for taste) the conclusion described me as worthy of lamp living or whatever. 142... plain Jane common variety genius. I suppose I could copy paste but it's mostly friendly fluff.

Of course, if you pass the time perusing a text based headline news forum full of unusual people who have likely been banned or dropped out of everywhere else for reasons... well, you're as near anomoly as any other might be closer to the Sistine than the herd.

Sooooooo bored.

So if you know where I might find nice distribution patterns... that would be great.

Also, a basic IQ graph would be fun to see in the rolodex.

Have you seen the Harvard Youtube Channel?
Huuuuuuurrrrrr clown world.
What do, eh?

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>