REPLY TO THREAD
|
Subject
|
R2-Huma-Abedin-Giustra-Hillary-Clinton-racketeering-indictment.pdf
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFORTHE SUPREME COURTS OF PENNSYLVANIARobert Blair, Jeremy Lowe, Don Bailey, Stephen Duane Curry (in private capacity by special appearance only): CRIMINAL ACTION FOR FULLPUNITIVE DAMAGES: v. COMMONGRAND JURY DEMANDED:CONCERNING UNAUTHORIZED SALE OF ENRICHED URANIUM FOR EMBEZZLEMENT : 99-9421HUMA ABEDIN of CLINTON FOUNDATION, FRANK GIUSTRA OF CLINTON-GIUSTRA ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP, JOHN PODESTA of Podesta Group, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON of CLINTON FOUNDATION(Abedinet. all) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FOR FORMAL PROSECUTION OF SALE OF URANIUM TO UNAUTHORIZED PARTIESHon. Christine Donahue,December2, 2017The allegations in relation to accused party HUMA ABEDIN, as it relates to just one minor aspect of the URANIUM ONE filings areserious enough to warrant a separate superseding indictment. HUMAABEDIN in full capacity as Huma Abedin; was officially present atseveral meetings in Kazahkstan alongside FRANKGIUSTRAand the CLINTON-GIUSTRAENTERPRISEPARTNERSHIPto take official receipt of anundisclosed backroom deal, involving the mines in the region. As such, this is deemed an official quid-quo pro with grave national security implications which directly affect the interests of the united states. In passing, it offersus a glimpse into a criminal transaction thattook place prior to the largest package deals being cut for URANIUMONE and their private access stage pass into America’s actual national interests. Also present for the initial phase of this deal was noneother than BILLCLINTON. On a wide scale, this illicit deal had a negative affecton the entire nation’s uniform security protocols and receives explicitspecial‘focus’mention for this reason.
Full PDF file here:
[link to docdro.id (secure)]
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Next Page >> |
|