Users Online Now:
2,116
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,618,459
Pageviews Today:
2,363,057
Threads Today:
646
Posts Today:
13,337
07:15 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
wouldn't the Song of Solomon be considered porn back then?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 71415603:MV80MDYxMjcwXzczNTc3MDI0X0ZGNzFBOTMx] [quote:anastasis888:MV80MDYxMjcwXzczNTc2OTAzX0U0NEUwMkZB] No, because it's not porn. Fruit trays never were so sexual, though. It's the most erotic thing you'll ever read that has not one word that can be proven to be erotic, or can it? ;-) [/quote] It definitely utilizes erotic imagery. The question really is, is it obscene or base enough to be considered porn? But if you can't admit it's erotic I guess yeah you'll never admit it's porn. [/quote]
Original Message
It's pretty erotic for their times I'd imagine.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>