Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,014 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 45,816
Pageviews Today: 86,672Threads Today: 46Posts Today: 733
01:16 AM

Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
Subject John Doe begs judge not to name names in Epstein gal pal case
User Name
Font color:  Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message NEWS
John Doe begs judge not to name names in Epstein gal pal case
By Emily Saul

September 3, 2019 | 4:38pm

Giuffre, Prince Andrew and Maxwell
Virginia Giuffre (now Roberts) in an evidence photo with Prince Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell, inside Prince Andrew's London home.
An anonymous man terrified he’s about to be named in court papers related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s alleged child sex trafficking ring is begging a judge not to release his name and identities of others accused — because it could tarnish their reputations, according to a surprise motion filed Tuesday.

Lawyers for the John Doe filed the letter Tuesday — just a day before Epstein’s self-proclaimed “sex slave” Virginia Roberts Giuffre is expected to join her lawyers in court as they continue efforts to unseal thousands of pages of documents related to her civil lawsuit against the dead pedophile’s alleged procuress.

“As a non-party to these proceedings, Doe lacks specific knowledge about the contents of the Sealed Materials,” his lawyers wrote to Manhattan federal court judge Loretta Preska. “But it is clear that these materials implicate the privacy and reputational interests of many persons other than the two primary parties to this action, Giuffre and Maxwell.”

The letter goes on to say a prior judge overseeing the case summarized the still-secret documents as containing a “range of allegations of sexual acts involving Plaintiff and non-parties to this litigation, some famous, some not; the identities of non-parties who either allegedly engaged in sexual acts with Plaintiff or who allegedly facilitated such acts.”

[link to nypost.com (secure)]
Pictures (click to insert)
 | Next Page >>