|
REPLY TO THREAD
|
|
Subject
|
BIG update Top Pg.3: "What About BOB?" meets "What About Carl?" Psychology Today Suggestion Carl Jung May have been "disturbe
|
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
EDITED: 12-07-2019
THIS STATEMENT would be crazy enough if it were just found in a TABLOID
(like "The Sun" or "National Inquirer"...but THIS was
actually stated recently in "The New Yorker,""Psychology Today"
and other periodicals since Jung's THE RED BOOK was published
and his strange "art therapy paintings" were made public:
Carl Jung May have been hiding his own mental illness during his career?
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]
This is a long thread, however if you are a proud owner
of Carl Jung's THE RED BOOK...or if you have studied even
Psychology 101 to understand the vastly important body of
research and discovery by this wonderful multi-disciplined
scholar, then you owe it to yourself to wade through the
information I've put together for us here. WHO WILL STAND
UP FOR JUNG? The GLP community should be the first to
cry: "NO WAY JUNG WAS "CRAZY!"
Two articles: The Wall Street Journal and Psychology Today
Magazine ran parallel articles one day apart questioning
the sanity of this important man, Carl Jung, the Father of
Analytical Psychology. One has to wonder "what's the agenda
here?" Let's look!
[link to www.wsj.com (secure)]
and
[link to www.psychologytoday.com (secure)]
UNBELIEVABLE! Go ahead...google it yourself...Articles are coming
out now that Freud's creative genius protoge, creator of the concept
"The collective unconscious" and artist Carl Jung...
may have been NUTS! (Hey! I'm just the messenger here,
and of course, I DISAGREE mightily!) Here is the latest
I can find on a quick search (do one yourself!) Here's a
link:
[link to psychcentral.com (secure)]
CAN A "SHRINK" BE SECRETLY NUTS...AND STILL HAVE
A SUCCESSFUL PRACTICE? AND WHY THIS ATTACK ON JUNG COMING
NOW?
OFFICIAL TRAILER the movie "What About Bob?" There are
all kinds of movies out there about psychiatrists...but
this one sticks out as my favorite with BOTH the patient
(Bill Murray) and the doctor being slightly "on-the-fritz!"
[link to youtu.be (secure)]
Richard Dryfus and Bill Murray are a hilarious team
where we see Dryfus (Dr. Marvin) worried about his REPUTATION
and standing among the psychiatric community when a truly
dedicated "patient" (Bill Murray as Bob) follows him on vacation
in an effort to continue his therapy--uninterrupted even by
Dr. Marvin's family vacation--and begins to stalk him. There
were MOMENTS when the "shrink" was more crazy than his patient!
While it is a great topic for a comedy...preserving one's reputation
(even if challenged by a nutty client) at ANY of the higher
levels of science is a real worry for many professionals
called-on-the-carpet for any new theories which fly in the face of the existing
"status quo." We saw this in the thread on Douglas Vogt's new revelation
about our sun having a 12,000 year cycle at which point it has either a
minor or a major solar micro-nova. This is being challenged right now in
the science circles as we have heard from Ben Davidson at Suspicious Observers.
Thread: Greatest Secret of the United States, Causes of the Ice Age and Nova,
Vogt and Davidson have even been accused of having REAL LIFE
"Cassandra Complexes!" (Where have we head this before?)
Well...if you are a Carl Jung fan--it appears that Carl Jung
is currently being scrutinized for the same reason!
So now...Carl Jung "coined" "THE CASSANDRA COMPLEX"
...because he HAD ONE HIMSELF?
A MAJOR "soft disclosure" (12-2018 ON GLP HOSTED with "ADRAGON")
by researcher Dr. Douglas Vogt has brought to our attention NEW
INFORMATION about the "secret history of Earth" (which Velikovsky
and others after him attempted to bring forward to a stoic mainstream
science community in the 60's) Now..."Armed" with this new theory,
we can see how it gives a NEW BREATH to the remarkable symbolism
contained in Dr. Jung's "Catastrophe Art" (my own term for Jung's
bizaar painting) in Jung's "RED BOOK" published after his death.
(*I've coined the phrase, "Catastrophe Art" as given this new info
uncovered as an exclusive for the GLP Community will prove Immanuel
Velikovsky most certainly conveyed "end of the world scenarios"
to his friend Dr. Jung which inspired some of his artwork) and
also inspired a new thread.:
Thread: Dr. Carl Jung's "Catastrophe-Art" Meets Velikovski, Vogt, Davidson and the Solar Micro-Nova--Did Jung KNOW?
AND ALSO:
Thread: Greatest Secret of the United States, Causes of the Ice Age and Nova,
MUST WATCH FOR THIS THREAD'S TOPIC:
Part 1:
[link to youtu.be (secure)]
and Part 2:
[link to youtu.be (secure)]
KEEP IN YOUR MIND'S-EYE INFO/IMAGES FROM THE 2 VIDEOS
POSTED ABOVE...THEN LOOK "WITH NEW EYES" AT CARL JUNG'S ART!
A SHORT TOUR THROUGH "THE RED BOOK" (JUNG'S PAINTINGS)
THESE ARE THE "SMOKING GUN PAINTINGS" BY CARL JUNG SHOWING
THAT...HE KNEW WHAT VELIKOVSKI KNEW!
END OF EDITS SECTION
--------------------------------------------
"Hey! Did you guys feel THAT?" What was that...Another
8 pt. quake in Indonesia...A huge gamma ray burst? What the heck?"
ANSWER:
No...Not a quake! It's a few 1,000 Carl Jung fans running to
their local bookstores for a REFUND (some are $300-500+) for
the misinterpretation of his original artwork in "The Red Book!"
So...just like the movie "What About Bob?"...we can ask: "What About Carl (Jung?)"
[link to youtu.be (secure)]
OFFICIAL TRAILER FOR "WHAT ABOUT BOB?"
The movie (above) is what most people's exposure to psychiatry (who have not
had the personal joy of actually working with one personally) with their ideas
shaped by "shrinks in movies" (and their nutty patients) from mainstream Hollywood.
Richard Dryfus plays the classic Freudian Psychiatrist (Dr. Marvin)--a spin off
of Kelsey Grammar's "Frasier" series from 1993-2004 which came first--while
Bill Murray plays the wacko "Bob" who is so keen on having a resolution to his "phobias"
he can't wait for the good doctor to finish his trip and stalks the him creating
a hilarious vacation farce. It's a great flick...even if a little misleading about
doctor/patient relationships.
But let's look at a REAL "shrink"...Carl Jung who has had some run-ins
lately with mainstream psychiatry (the chemical straight-jacket providers)
in what I believe is an "agenda" by Big Pharma to change our view of
traditional "talking cures" like Analytical Psychology inspired by Jung in favor of their "A.B.C. named chemical
"fixes."
January 1, 2015 I hosted this thread for the GLP family:
Thread: Big UPDATE pg 7!!Part 2. The "Father of Modern Psychology," Carl Jung Kept Planetary "Doom" Secret for 80 years! Update/Warning se
In the thread above I came across an amazing video--a Tour of Carl Jung's RED BOOK
--to see very personal and private artwork created (but NOT explained)
by the genius of Carl Jung during his life. This book, The Red Book
--an effort to profit by revealing personal diaries and artwork by Jung's
heirs and certain art dealers who compiled the book (it was never an actual
creation by Carl Jung himself--hence explains the reason the artwork was
MISUNDERSTOOD and misinterpreted.)
Look at the video presentation of Jung's artwork and tell me
(keeping in mind the theories in the EDITS section as you look)
if you don't see very accurate symbolic presentations in the
paintings of things that look like space weather disasters!
For an example, doesn't this painting (found in The RED BOOK)
seem to be depicting the day of a solar micro-nova as Vogt/Davidson
describe it? I don't think this is just a "sunny day...I'm ready for
a picnic theme!" Jung didn't just paint "pretty pictures"--these were
done as "personal and private therapy" to attempt to integrate into
his own subconscious mind images Velikovsky would have shared that
were too scary for him reconcile in his waking thoughts.
(Even his own heirs--who we can't actually be sure knew
what it was the Velikovsky shared with their relative before
he died--probably didn't realize Jung wouldn't have wanted
those paintings compiled into a commercial book without
some context around the more "spooky images" people are
misinterpreting that's actually about space weather disasters past and future!)
QUESTION: The painting below (by Carl Jung) appears as
one of his "art pieces" in THE RED BOOK. Does this scary
vision lend ammunition to the argument Jung had "inner
demons" as he "hid his mental illness"...or (as you will
see below w/energy comparison is THIS one of many space-
related ideas conveyed to Jung by IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY
(during their decade's-long secret friendship?)
[link to youtu.be (secure)]
A "Virtual Tour of Carl Jung's The RED BOOK.
Shortly after this video, I stumbled across a very unflattering article
on Carl Jung in Psychology Today suggesting that Jung, himself, might
be mentally ill. Psychology Today called Carl Jung "Disturbed" and
haunted by "Demons" for his Red Book (catastrophe) Art!
[link to www.psychologytoday.com (secure)]
Here is a very recent quote from the first link in the Edits (above)
that is actually hard to believe MADE IT INTO PRINT and
wasn't scratched out in red ink by the magazine's editor!
How on earth do they come up with this stuff? (No...I do
NOT believe this to be the truth about Jung--it is classic
"yellow journalism!")
[link to psychcentral.com (secure)]
[Less than 50%]
Over the course of 16 years, Jung recorded everything he experienced in these unconscious journeys. Some of the material ended up filling 205 large pages in the red book. The book consists of intricate, colorful, wildly detailed drawings and writings. “The Red Book,” as it was later called, stayed locked up in a vault after Jung’s death. It was finally published in 2009 as The Red Book and is now available for sale.
The New York Times describes the story told by the Red Book:
The book tells the story of Jung trying to face down his own demons as they emerged from the shadows. The results are humiliating, sometimes unsavory. In it, Jung travels the land of the dead, falls in love with a woman he later realizes is his sister, gets squeezed by a giant serpent and, in one terrifying moment, eats the liver of a little child.
[End Quote]
And more from Psycology Today's article:
[Quote less than 50%]
[Quote Psychology Today article less than 50%]
Although Jungians have been quick to downplay any suggestion
that the book ["The RED BOOK"]records more than its author's
spiritual crisis or a foretaste of his evolving intellectual
path, the book, which Jung christened Liber Novus (Latin for "New Book"),
documents such matters as his conversations with the winged
"Philemon" during his daytime walks. By that point, the
Swiss psychiatrist had been treating schizophrenia for several
years. And though Shamdasani insists that Jung was engaging
in a controlled experiment—"There wasn't anything like a psychosis"
—the wrinkle in that story is that Jung's unusual hallucinations
appear to have been involuntary. Were they therefore signs of madness?
Indeed, it's worth asking whether Jung today would be at risk of
receiving the diagnosis "psychosis risk syndrome." The DSM-5 task force
is currently formulating the term to include hallucations and delusions.
[END Quote]
NOTE: Sonu Shamdasani was not a medical psychiatrist but
rather an Art Dealer/Historian. He would have had zero
"context" to understand many of the images Shamdasani
would include in THE RED BOOK were Jung's very private
therapy sessions in which he attempted to integrate into
his own subconscious the very disturbing reports from
his friend Velikovsky concerning the catastrophic history
of Earth. Without context for these images, now, come people
with an "agenda" to smear Jung's reputation and discredit
"the talking-cure" (non-drug based therapy) of Analytical
Psychology (the type of therapy we saw in "What About Bob.")
This video is the latest in the series informing the
public of disturbing NEW INFORMATION about Earth's
"catastrophic geology"--this one Nov. 2019 from Dr. Dunning
and Ben Davidson (of S.O.)
[link to youtu.be (secure)]
(Keep this report in mind looking at Carl Jung's
amazing images from his "RED BOOK.") There is no doubt
in my mind that Velikovsky's theories which he would have
shared with Jung included this report.
Continued on Post #2
|
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | | Next Page >> |
|
