Users Online Now:
2,228
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,443,253
Pageviews Today:
2,407,510
Threads Today:
967
Posts Today:
17,200
10:27 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
can you build a drone to fly near a chemtrail plane to film it spraying?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 76654095:MV80MjU5MDUzXzc3Njk3MDEwX0NGNUUwRDRE] [quote:Anonymous Coward 10599025:MV80MjU5MDUzXzc3NjkyOTUwXzkzM0QwM0Y0] Why is it so difficult to find a chemtard who is willing to discuss the facts about the trails in the sky? Do facts even matter to chemtards? How do they vet their sources of information? Because it sure looks like chemtard believe what they want to believe without any desire to learn the other side of the coin, science. Why do chemtards accept the assumptions of other chemtards as truth? Morons agreeing with each other about anything is NOT a good record! Someone said science is rejected because of "funding" and blah blah blah... I have no fucking doubt that people have paid to have bullshit published. But, no one has shown that the science that explains the trails in the sky, more than adequately, is anything but truth/fact. Chemtards make assumptions and convince themselves that it's normal to believe their own assumptions over the expertise of real scientists. IT'S FUCKING CRAZY! I have recently posted some links to atmospheric science sites and not one chemtard was interested in learning about the subject. why? [/quote] If they had any interest in the truth their first step would be to objectively attempt to confirm the trails to be what they are purported by those in know to be, which is contrails. First step in any process such as this is to eliminate the obvious first, in this case that would be contrails. You can’t simply claim the absurd without first disproving the obvious. Have you ever encountered a chemtard who actually gave sound arguments for why the trails they are referring to could not just be contrails? Have you ever encountered a chemtard who was able to give a scientific reason why contrails shouldn’t persist? [/quote]
Original Message
what tools do i need to make a drone like this?
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>