Users Online Now:
2,296
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
882,707
Pageviews Today:
1,168,494
Threads Today:
288
Posts Today:
4,423
09:47 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Forced Vax in South Carolina - Law since 1905 - Update in OP
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Turtle Flower:MV80Mzg2NTU1Xzc5ODQ5NTQ5XzM4ODUzMzk=] Got to go do the daily chores, I'll be back. I'll add some numbers when I get back if anyone wants to call. SC Senator Shane Massey SC Rep Bill Hixon Those are the guys to call according to my FB friend. [/quote]
Original Message
SECTION 44-29-50. Violation of regulation relating to vaccination, screening, or immunization.
Any person who shall fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any regulation of the Department of Health and Environmental Control relating to vaccination, screening or immunization shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not more than one hundred dollars or be imprisoned for not more than thirty days.
HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 32-578; 1952 Code Section 32-578; 1942 Code Section 5042; 1932 Code Section 1503; Cr. C. '22 Section 451; Cr. C. '12 Section 441; 1905 (24) 871; 1972 (57) 2523.
[
link to www.scstatehouse.gov (secure)
]
I live in SC - this is terrifying.
***Update***
It appears this has been law since 1905, never used, but still law. The SC Senator returned my concerned call at 9:15pm Monday night and agreed that it was scary. He was a nice young man (getting old is so odd) and explained (if I understood correctly) it would be easier to challenge the law if the state ever tried to us it, then it would be to go in and rewrite the law. He didn’t think SC would attempt to use it as the backlash would be overwhelming.
But yes, it’s law and has been for 115 years.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>