Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,802 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 768,629
Pageviews Today: 1,312,927Threads Today: 501Posts Today: 9,297
02:41 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject The Russian Vaccine is the Real Deal, is superior to the West's Big Pharma Vaccines, and is the reason for the Navalny Poisoning
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message Now we will see if Western Governments truly care about the health of their citizens, or are more beholden to Big Pharma. The Navalny poisoning was the work of Western special services, not Russia. The goal was to smear Russia's superior "Sputnik V" vaccine (and also try and derail Nordstream II). This German claim Navalny was poisoned by Novichok is a fantastic accusation, on a par with witchcraft blame. This shows extreme disregard for the Western public. The inventors of this lie consider you dumb. No sane person would possibly believe Putin would poison a man with the brand poison and ship him to Germany, at that. Nobody is that dumb. However, the Guardian and the NYT supported this claim. These newspapers are evil, plain evil, in their relentless drive to stop the vaccine and the Nordstream II.

this German claim Navalny was poisoned by Novichok of Skripal fame. It is a fantastic accusation, on a par with witchcraft blame. This shows extreme disregard for the Western public. The inventors of this lie consider you dumb. No sane person would possibly believe “Putin” would poison a man with the brand poison and ship him to Germany, at that. Nobody is that dumb. However, the Guardian and the NYT supported this claim. These newspapers are evil, plain evil, in their relentless drive to stop the vaccine and the Nordstream II. Of course, Nordsteam II isn't helped by the "poisoning", but I think it's more about the Russian COVID vaccine.

The Lancet has published a review of the Russian vaccine. The Lancet's review states:

1 No serious adverse effects were found

2 Because of the vaccine's two-stage introduction technology, the vaccine appears to have induced long-term immune response in 100% of subjects vaccinated, with antibody levels 1.4-1.5 times higher than in non-vaccinated infected individuals who have recovered from Covid-19

3 The vaccine's effectiveness is not reduced by pre-existing anti-adenovirus immunity.

It is the use of a 2nd, different vector for the booster shot that makes it different from all the rest, and results in the production of both hunter and killer T-cells in addition to the 1st shot's anti-bodies.

The 2nd important point is that it was tested both in frozen and freeze-dried form with similar results. The freeze-dried version need only be kept between 2C-8C (a normal refrigerator or even drink cooler), so it can reach those parts of the world where the more elaborate vaccine delivery systems can't.

As it's the most advanced architecturally, and the most likely to yield long term immunity it also yields the most robust competition to the West's short-term pseudo-vaccines. Floating another black cloud of doubt over Russia's medical laboratories goes a long way to paying back the West's politicians' debts to the Big Pharma co's that helped put them where they are.

As for who was really behind the Navalny "poisoning", former Reagen nuclear advisor Dr. Gordon Prather made some interesting insights when Litvinenko was poisoned by Polonium, and those insights help put the Navalny poisoning into proper context. I recall Prather making the point that Polonium has a "fingerprint" of the reactor in which it was produced. He stated that it would be a simple matter for the IAEA, which has all of the NPT signatory "fingerprints", to confirm. Prather pointed at Israel because it would have been logical for the UK to have gone to the IAEA immediately, which it didn't. A year later, the UK announced it was from a Russian reactor, but refused to allow any other party access to the sample, and the IAEA never confirmed, to be best of my knowledge.
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP