REPLY TO THREAD
|
Subject
|
In the Scenario That Trump Has Been an Actor Playing His Role, Here’s Why & How
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
If you want to destroy — or at least inflict a major blow to — an ideology (Nationalism in this case), would it not make sense to attach an abhorrent personality to it; to back it?
Then, this abhorrent personality actor does & says things that make it difficult for even the staunchest supporter of the Nationalist ideology to swallow, but most continue to support the actor because the alternative is a major move toward Globalism via Marxism.
For the final death blow, an event is orchestrated to put the final dagger into the actor and, hence, the movement he led. This is accomplished through implied encouragement (incitement) and the complicity of certain high-ranking decision makers on Capitol Hill who appear to have not only issued a stand-down order, but to have actively allowed protestors into the Capitol Building — not long enough to destroy it, but long enough to provide photographs & video to sway public opinion against the movement, before then clamping down, calling in reinforcements, and ending their allowed, staged show after the desired effect was achieved.
The majority of the country turns against the actor, and by association, the movement he led. Nationalism is discredited. All in just 4 years.
The amount of damage done to the Nationalist ideology is something a war could not accomplish.
Today’s wars aren’t about armies occupying land. They’re about perceptions occupying minds.
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Next Page >> |
|