Users Online Now:
1,502
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
567,869
Pageviews Today:
728,210
Threads Today:
202
Posts Today:
2,479
06:25 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
CHAUVIN Juror Went to BLM RALLY and WORE this SHIRT "GET YOUR KNEE OFF OUR NECKS"
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:GooPile:MV80Nzc3MzUwXzg3MDgzMjEzXzVDMEVEOEFB] [quote:FeedYourHead:MV80Nzc3MzUwX0NBMkU5QTVD] Think the verdict will be overturned? https://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2021/05/03/derek-chauvin-juror-brandon-mitchells-participation-in-d-c-march-could-help-appeal-legal-experts-say/ Think Chauvin got a fair trial? [/quote] It is looking increasing likely and absolutely not. Maybe he committed a crime, maybe assault or manslaughter, but it was 50:50 (at best) whether Floyd died of asphyxiation or heart attack, nothing compelling to suggest he suffocated to death besides his words of "I can't breathe" which he began uttering BEFORE he was 'positionally asphyxiated' (he also adapted it from "I can't choke" as an excuse for claustrophobia, and continued complaining he was claustrophobic while being 'cruelly' pinned to the ground). Once you remove that from the equation, there is no compelling reason to favor asphyxiation over heart attack, and reasonable doubt should have been awarded to Chauvin, but the jurors came with a preplanned motive as evidence by their desire (according to this juror) to end deliberations 20 minutes in. Wouldn't surprise me if there were more perjurers on that jury protected from online researchers by their anonymity, undoubtedly cleansing their social media as we speak. The more important question is how can he get a fair trial the second time around. He can't. The world has now heard his excuse. The media has declared him guilty. They have twisted polls to say the majority support the verdict (the first poll amassed those who chose he was guilty of murder with those who chose he was guilty of 'negligence' into the one category to claim the public vastly supported the verdict of guilty of murder and manslaughter, the poll actually showed more than half thought he was guilty of manslaughter or less. Since then more polls have come out without an exploration of the question of what people felt he was guilty of, so that may be deception, or it may be evidence that they are swaying the public with their initial deception). Chances of a fair trial NOW are reduced compared with before, IMO. [/quote]
Original Message
Think the verdict will be overturned?
[
link to minnesota.cbslocal.com (secure)
]
Think Chauvin got a fair trial?
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>