|
REPLY TO THREAD
|
|
Subject
|
Media says dogs can sniff covid on a person – can they also identify vaccinated people who are “shedding?” want virus-sniffing dogs
|
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
[link to www.naturalnews.com (secure)]
You know what is more accurate than a PCR test for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19)? A dog’s nose, according to a new study.
Researchers out of France claim that canines are more effective at screening for viruses than laboratory tests that, quite frankly, are being manipulated to further the Chinese Virus agenda.
Sniffing dogs are also more effective at detecting viruses than fast lateral flow tests (LFTs), scientists say, having the ability to detect the presence of the Wuhan Flu with upwards of 97 percent accuracy.
How they determined this is unknown, but a trial conducted back in March and April at France’s national veterinary school and at the clinical research unit of Paris’ Necker-Cochin hospital found that dogs are capable of detecting both “positive” and “negative” cases of the virus better than the tests the government has been pushing.
A recent review of 64 different studies found that LFTs correctly identify about 72 percent of people who are infected with the virus and show symptoms, along with 58 percent who do not. Dogs, on the other hand, correctly identified 91 percent of negative samples and 97 percent of positive samples.
“These results are scientific confirmation of dogs’ capacity to detect the olfactory signature of Covid-19,” the Paris hospital board said, noting that the study is the first of its kind to make these determinations.
Now they want virus-sniffing dogs at the airport?
According to Prof. Jean-Marc Tréluyer, dog’s noses are at least as effective at detecting the Chinese Virus as the PCR test, assuming it is “tuned” correctly to not produce a false positive.
|
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | | Next Page >> |
|
