Users Online Now:
1,234
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
346,629
Pageviews Today:
451,957
Threads Today:
148
Posts Today:
1,678
03:55 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:notsofastmr:MV80OTY4MzAwXzkwODYyMTY1XzNDRTNCMDBD] [quote:Dr. Feelgood:MV80OTY4MzAwXzkwODYyMTQ5Xzc2MzlFQTU=] [quote:notsofastmr:MV80OTY4MzAwXzkwODYxODU0XzdEQUQ0NzM4] [quote:Dr. Feelgood:MV80OTY4MzAwXzkwODYxMzA5XzcyM0UyMDIx] [quote:notsofastmr:MV80OTY4MzAwXzkwODYxMDUzX0VEREE4MzIz] of course it has. it might have been true at one point. but now it's been isolated. if it hasn't then how are they doing this https://genxpro.net/sars-cov-2-qpcr-assays-2/ [/quote] Ok. Cool. So then it should be easy peasy for you to provide a study confirming isolation within the terms provided above. [/quote] you're only ever going to get CGI as it's too small to optically see. your request is impossible. [/quote] So we are supposedly in the biggest pandemic in recorded history, which has lead to entire countries being shit down, global vaccine campaign, decimation of numerous rights but it can not be demonstrated that this virus exists and can be transmitted in a lab without a computer? Why is that? I didn't ask to see it, I asked for confirmation that it exists and can be transmitted to humans. Why is it "impossible" for this virus to be proven in a scientific experiment which can be replicated without using computer sequencing? Are you thereby confirming that you can not counter that this virus has never been biologically isolated and all the $¢ien¢e is based on computer modelling? Just a few minutes ago you said of course it has been isolated. Well, show me. [/quote] well, it gets even funnier when you realise the first primers release by the CDC were based on a random generation of previous sars/corona genetics. [/quote]
Original Message
Edit: That's a wrap.
7 pages and counting and no isolated sample to be found.
All supposed "isolated Covid 19 samples" are based on computer generated "genetic code" which came from CHINA and has no evidence to back it up or allow for independent replication (AKA legit science) because China (who for whatever fucking retarded reason TPTB trust implicitly at their word) "destroyed their samples and evidence."
It's bullshit piled on lies with a heaping dose of corruption and propaganda.
There is a ton of great info and perspective in this thread. I hope it helps people understand the reality of this scamdemic better.
There are some very interesting videos early on in the thread and some excellent explanations by RHCP on pages 6 and 7.
*******
So we were having a debate about this in another thread. A poster claimed that C19 had been isolated but all the studies or links he posted were done with computer sequencing.
I have dug around a little myself and thus far have yet to see any confirmation of what I would consider a legitimate isolated sample.
So here is what I am asking for:
No computer sequencing
No computer generated genomes
No computer generated "consensus genetic code"
No monkey business, no bovine BS
Can not be confirmed using a PCR test based on computer generated genomes, sorry, you can't confirm existence of a real biological thing by comparing it to a computer generated thing.
If you have a source of isolation of biological material, which was proven to be able to be transmitted to a human or to human (only) cells AND result in reinfection of the new host with "covid 19" in a peer reviewed study, preferably which has been successfully replicated yielding the same result by using the same methods (no computer sequencing)...
...then PLEASE share this info with GLP.
Bonus questions:
Why does the original rtPCR test documentation say "no isolated sample was available" ?
How can PCR tests based on computer generated genome be considered legitimate "science" and why would any study based on computer generated PCR testing be trustworthy in providing accurate data?
Have it it folks.
If everyone can try to be nice it would be appreciated.
One way or another let's settle this shit!
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>