Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,998 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 1,229,738
Pageviews Today: 2,002,571	Threads Today: 620	Posts Today: 11,369
06:21 PM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject Why no proper aspiration used for the jab? Unnecessary potentially life threatening risk.

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:McKracken:MV80OTkxNTAwXzEzODU5MjY2]
In countries following the CDC vaccination guidelines, which already existed pre 2019, aspiration is not applied anymore in general during the injection. That means during the injection no direct check is done to verify that the vaccine is not entering the blood stream and stays intramuscular like the vendors absolutely require. Only indirect mitigations are done, like using the correct needle length or selecting a spot with low probability of hitting a blood vessel.

If the vaccine enters the blood stream, it is often a critical and potential life threatening situation as blood clots can form on the vaccine micro particulates. Most TV snippets showing injections now show clearly a direct one way push, no slight pull on the syringe plunger as it was done pre-2017 usually.

The vendors don’t add the strict requirement for intramuscular injection without reason.

Dr. Campbell, retired Nursing Teacher in the UK, repeated about this topic several times already on his channel. Most recently here:
[youtube] https://youtu.be/D6hUoosMOuU[/youtube]

The CDC guideline from 2017 where it changed to no aspiration:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/general-recs/administration.html

I have read somewhere  that already around 2005 was a similar change published, but couldn’t find it. There is strangely not much foundation in references given in public about this CDC decision.

All this together makes it for informed self-thinking citizens even more difficult to follow the vaccine story. This combination appears like a Kafkaesk nightmare.
[/quote]

Original Message In countries following the CDC vaccination guidelines, which already existed pre 2019, aspiration is not applied anymore in general during the injection. That means during the injection no direct check is done to verify that the vaccine is not entering the blood stream and stays intramuscular like the vendors absolutely require. Only indirect mitigations are done, like using the correct needle length or selecting a spot with low probability of hitting a blood vessel.

If the vaccine enters the blood stream, it is often a critical and potential life threatening situation as blood clots can form on the vaccine micro particulates. Most TV snippets showing injections now show clearly a direct one way push, no slight pull on the syringe plunger as it was done pre-2017 usually.

The vendors don’t add the strict requirement for intramuscular injection without reason.

Dr. Campbell, retired Nursing Teacher in the UK, repeated about this topic several times already on his channel. Most recently here:

The CDC guideline from 2017 where it changed to no aspiration:
[link to www.cdc.gov (secure)]

I have read somewhere that already around 2005 was a similar change published, but couldn’t find it. There is strangely not much foundation in references given in public about this CDC decision.

All this together makes it for informed self-thinking citizens even more difficult to follow the vaccine story. This combination appears like a Kafkaesk nightmare.

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>