Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 969 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 324,430
Pageviews Today: 491,343	Threads Today: 191	Posts Today: 2,451
05:43 AM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject YT censors all comments regarding vaccine ingredients

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Happy in Nature:MV81MjcyMDU3Xzk3MTcxMDI3XzQ5RTc0MkZG]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 78067678:MV81MjcyMDU3Xzk3MTY4Njc5Xzk3Q0Q4MTM1]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 77949466:MV81MjcyMDU3Xzk3MTY4NjQwX0M1M0M2QTUy]
[quote:Anonymous Coward 80122451:MV81MjcyMDU3Xzk3MTY3OTQ2XzdGNjA5ODBD]
This one again?

Fake pseudoscience claim:

The Moderna vaccine contains SM-102 which could cause health complaints such as cancer, fertility damage and damage to the nervous system, kidneys or respiratory system.

Fact:

These claims about SM-102 are from a product safety leaflet when it is in a mixed solution with a toxic substance called chloroform. The Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, but not chloroform.

A Facebook user has posted a video which suggests that the Moderna vaccine is dangerous to human health because one of its ingredients appears to be described as hazardous and toxic in a safety data sheet. But this warning applies to the ingredient (a lipid called SM-102) when it is in a mixture with chloroform, a known highly toxic substance.

The video shows someone Google “simple ingredients for the moderna vaccine”. They then scroll through the results, and find that an ingredient “SM-102” is first in a bullet point list. Searching for SM-102 leads to a chemical supplier’s website.

The user downloads the safety data sheet provided and highlights a number of hazards associated with the substance. These include warnings that it is “highly flammable”, “suspected of causing cancer”, “suspected of damaging fertility” and causes “damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver, the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure” amongst others.

Although the Moderna vaccine does contain SM-102, and the Facebook video does follow a link to a genuine safety data sheet, the safety information refers to SM-102 in a mixture with chloroform, which is known to be a toxic substance.

The third page of the leaflet shown in the video, explains the product listing, stating that chloroform (which makes up 90% of this particular mixture) is a “dangerous” component. The SM-102 makes up 10% of the mixture described in the leaflet.

https://fullfact.org/health/SM-102/

And OP wonders why nobody will listen to them.
[/quote]

Did you actually read the MSDS? Or did you just take their word for it? Do you have experience with this at work? It clearly says SM-102 is specifically what it is addressing. If it was a mixture it would say the name of the product or mixture at the top not specifically SM-102. It’s not talking about a 90/10 mixture at all. It shows the dangers of mixing it. That doesn’t mean shit. Politifact is partisan bullshit and that should be your first clue
[/quote]

Yes, it’s right here.

https://cdn.caymanchem.com/cdn/msds/33474m.pdf#page=3

And there’s no chloroform in it. Besides, this is not the stock that was used in formulating the vaccines anyway. It’s the lipid SM-102, but it’s a product that’s not for human use, as it says right in the SDS.

Now think about this for a minute - it’s easy to analyze a liquid down to the parts per billion level of chloroform. If there was actually any chloroform in the vaccines, which there isn’t, don’t you think someone would have done that analysis to prove it?

This is just such utter nonsense.
[/quote]
I read the MSDS and wrote to Cayman Chemicals. They changed their MSDS info three days after receipt of my email.

The lipid needs a carrier. SM102 uses a  chloroform. The patent for SM02 includes the chloroform carrier. SM102 is sold with 90% chloroform as a carrier.
[/quote]

Original Message Tried posting this multiple times on the latest Paul Joseph Watson video, but my comment disappears in less than a minute, no matter what I do to eliminate banned words.

Every single time I post about SM-102 on YT, my comment disappears. I am not shadow banned because all other comments appear, just not one that mentions vaxx ingredients.

My edited, banned comment:

"They didn't just smear us, they supported mandatory vaccinations that killed and injured millions of people. They banned us when we spoke the truth about the ingredients and effects of these not-vaccines.

SM followed by 102 (full name not allowed on YT) is a proprietary lipid by Cayman followed by Chemicals. It is 10% lipid and 90% chloroform. Chloroform penetrates the cell walls to deliver the lipid. The MSDS clearly states it is not for human or animal use, yet it is the second ingredient in vaccines by the company that starts with an M.

Chloroform has a half life of 180 days. When chloroform breaks down and touches an oxygen molecule, it becomes cyanide. Both cyanide and chloroform poisoning have similar side effects as covid. This is a crime that every single US Congressperson was made aware of in May 2021, as were the NIH, CDC, and the F-ing NY Times. There is no excuse. Every lying journalist, publisher and Twtter/FB/YT censor deserves to face a military tribunal for their role in the genocide of humanity. "I"m sorry," doesn't cut it.

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>