Users Online Now:
2,213
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
2,081,480
Pageviews Today:
2,891,585
Threads Today:
694
Posts Today:
13,701
09:54 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
BREAKING UPDATE: SCOTUS MAY HEAR CASE requiring response11-23-22 as soon as this week, for Lack of Investigation election fraud. pinned last week
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message
So there was the thread last week that got pinned the SCOTUS hearing the special case .
THIS IS THE UPDATED INFORMATION ON THAT CASE
a FRIEND SENT ME THE BELOW INFO, IF I GET A LINK I WILL ADD
IT WAS DOCKETED 10-24-22 AND NEEDED RESPONSE BY 11-23.
ON 11-23 DEFENDANTS WERE REQIRED TO SUBMIT A RESPONSE WITH AN OPPOSITION TO THE PETITIION . RATHER THAN REQUEST AN EXTENSION AND DRAG OUT THE CASE THE DEFENDANTS ATTORNEY WAIVED THE RIGHT TO RESPOND.AS IT TURNS OUT THE US ATTORNEYS WERE RELIEVED OF THEIR DUTY AND REPLACED WITH A SOLICITOR GENERAL AS THEIR ATTORNEY.
SCOTUS JUSTICES REVIEWED THE INFO AND PETITION WITH THE SOLICITOR GENERAL'S RESPONSE AND WILL NEED TO CONFERENCE THE CASE WHICH CAN HAPPEN AS EARLY AS THIS WEEK
IF 4 OF THE 9 JUSTICE VOTE TO HEAR THE CASE , THE CASE WILL BE HEARD. SHOULD THE SCOTUS HEAR THE CASE AND BRUNSON WIN 388 GOVERNMENT REP CAN BE ARRESTED FOR TREASON, AS OUTLINED IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE CASE , FOR FAILURE TO UPHOLD THEIR OATH TO PROTECT THE AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION.
bY FAILING TO INVESTIGATE IT WAS A BREACH OF THE OF NATIONAL SECURITY.
THE PINNED POST
Thread: Interesting Court Case on the SCOTUS Website. Response Required by Nov. 23rd!
ANOTHER PERSONS OPINION ON THIS
Thread: Juan O Savin and constitutional attorney weigh in on pending SCOTUS election case
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>