|
REPLY TO THREAD
|
|
Subject
|
Red-Pilled: Pope Benedict's Death may have triggered a 21-day countdown to DOOM according to one theory
|
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
This theory begins with the assumption that Pope Benedict never validly resigned and therefore remained the real Pope all along, remained the "Katechon" ("The Restrainer") and therefore with his death the Katechon has been lifted until until a new Pope is elected. But if Pope Francis is therefore an anti-pope as some allege, then we have entered uncharted and potentially very dangerous waters. Also, according to this theory, Pope Benedict foresaw what his enemies were planning and changed Canon Law just prior to his resignation in order put in place a "dead-man's switch":
"The passing of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI, the Successor of Saint Peter, has started the clock which countdowns the time set by the Papal Law Universi dominici gregis, for the election of a new Roman Pontiff.
This process is an unavoidable and necessary legal requirement for the College of Cardinals, who are given no special authority in the Church to elect the Roman Pontiff apart from this law.
In accord with n. 37 of that law, modified by Pope Benedict XVI on Feb. 22, 2013 A. D., the Cardinals must convene to elect a new pope of the Catholic Church within 21 days, for a valid election. This validity is granted by the Papal Law only under the most stringent and exclusive condition, of n. 77 of that law:
77. I decree that the dispositions concerning everything that precedes the election of the Roman Pontiff and the carrying out of the election itself must be observed in full, even if the vacancy of the Apostolic See should occur as a result of the renunciation of the Supreme Pontiff, in accordance with the provisions of Canon 333 § 2 of the Code of Canon Law and Canon 44 § 2 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches.
(Please note that the official English translation, has 'resignation' in place of 'renunciation' in the passage above, where as the only binding text, the Latin original reads, 'renunciation'.)
Thus, since Pope Benedict XVI never in fact renounced the petrine munus, which he was elected to receive in accord with express obligation of the Cardinals, in a conclave, specified in n. 53 of that same papal law, the College must convene.
In this regard, there is now an attempt by some to impose an entirely false narrative upon the present circumstances, not only as regards the completely non-factual assertions that Pope Benedict XVI has abdicated, or the attempt to signify that with the word 'resignation' which does not exist in the Church’s juridical norms currently in force, but also to insist that this Papal Law be interpreted according to English common law, where the mere holding of power gives one a right.
Contrariwise, in Church Law, which is based on Roman Law, the merely holding of power confers no right. Thus, the Cardinal electors, by the mere fact that they are the electors, have no right to alter the observance of the Law or chose not to fulfill it.
If they do, they would lose all right to elect the Roman Pontiff, and the Church would enter into an exception juridical situation..." [less than 50%] [link to www.fromrome.info (secure)]
|
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | | Next Page >> |
|
