Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,094 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 818,180
Pageviews Today: 1,447,226Threads Today: 613Posts Today: 10,655
04:42 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject BOMBSHELL: Either Hancock Lied and misled Parliament, or the UK Regulator MHRA lied.
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message The story begins with this excellent article:
[link to dailysceptic.org (secure)]
Blame Game Begins as MHRA Passes the Buck: “All the Covid Vaccine Authorisation Decisions Were Taken by the Government Minister”

The MHRA was FOIA'd, and said:
All the Covid vaccines and therapeutics authorisation decisions were taken by the Licensing Minister and were not delegated.”
(link to FOIA pdf): [link to dailysceptic.org (secure)]

YET LOOK WHAT I FOUND!
In this video, here, at 6m:

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Matt Hancock, then Health Secretary, says --in parliament--:
"we do not have a vaccine yet... but our strong independent regulator, the MHRA, will not approve a vaccine until it is clinically safe."

SO, WHO IS LYING??

-> And why did nobody at the MHRA speak up to say it was NOT their decision to license?
-> And why is Matt Hancock, with no medical expertise, making the final decision on licensing?

Someone lied.. UK MHRA Regulator says vax approval was down to Matt Hancock. Hancock said on record it was the MHRA who would approve if safe...
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP