|
REPLY TO THREAD
|
|
Subject
|
Obama, Wright and Farrakhan, who is throwing who under the bus?
|
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
Like ya'll I've been watching the Obama diaries this week and was wondering something.
All of a sudden Obama is distancing himself from Jeremiah Wright and rejecting Louis Farrakhan's endorsement.
Wright hasnt said anything different in the past five days that he didnt say in the sound bites from a month ago. So why is Obama saying he is "shocked" now when nothing has changed in 20 years? Of course its the polls but why has Wright come out of the shadows and been on four days of speeches confirming every word that Obama tried to make people believe was "selected" sound bits taken out of context by the vast right wing conspiracy and the Hillary camp?
Is Wright just pissed at Obama for turning his back on him?
Why did Farrakhan endorse Obama?
Wright and Farrakhan created Obama.
I wrote before that Obama became a member of Wright's church for street cred that he needed because he came from Hawaii, was educated in Ivy league schools, was not poor by any measure, and was half white.
Without Faarakhan, Wright and the Chicago Black Church's support, Obama could never have been accepted as a Black politician and won a single election in Chicago.
He was molded, supported and created to be a "Black" Politician from the streets of Chicago. A product of Marxist Black Liberation Theology and someone, like his mentors Louis and Jeremiah, endorses and espouses the beliefs of the Black Panther party.
He was their boy. So what happened?
Was it because white people became aware for the first time in their lives that black churches are different than white churches other than just the race of the people who attend? They hear a phrase called Black Liberation Theology that no one had ever heard before and begin to ask questions and become fascinated with hearing every word Jeremiah has to say. The more they hear the lower Obama drops in the polls.
Did Obama, like any politician have to distance himself from his radical black fathers and become the half white guy who doesnt agree with what they say?
Is Wright and Farrakhan pissed and feeling used and betrayed by Obama? Did he use them to get to be a US Senator and now he is turning against them for his personal political gain? That looks to be the obvious answer...
Or is it something else more sinister than the obvious?
Think about this for a minute....
Could it be that if Obama is elected President of the United States it would destroy Farrakhan and Wright's message of Black Liberation and take away their power over the oppressed Black man?
Could it be that Obama is raising above the lie and is becoming a person who might be able to "heal" the racial divide in the country, forever putting aside the idea that a Black man, oppressed by whitie and can never achieve the Presidency because a majority white nation would never elect a black man. That whites and blacks can live together with the respect that each deserves.
The day a Black man is elected President, is the day that Wright and Farrakhan have to put aside their message of oppression and with that, they have to give up their power to the new leader of "Hope and Reconciliation". A message that is opposite of what they preach.
Obama might really be the good guy here.
Hell NO, I dont think he is good guy enough to support him over McCain and still think he is a friggen liberal who would be a disaster as President ~ but in this respect, I think he may be getting the shaft from his own guys and that is pretty damn sad.
|
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | | Next Page >> |
|
