Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,564 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,205,692
Pageviews Today: 2,116,356Threads Today: 804Posts Today: 16,065
10:49 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject If textbooks will lie about the AGE OF THE EARTH then why wouldn't they lie about EVOLUTION?
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message CLAIM: The earth was formed from a molten mass over billions of years.

FACT: Molten igneous claims for granite are only theory or belief. They have never been produced in a lab.

Granite radio halos show granite was formed in less than three minutes ( Science, vol. 184, pp. 62-66, April 5, 1974 ).
[link to www.halos.com]





CLAIM: Evolution is not racist. Man did not evolve from monkeys. There were different branches of the evolutionary tree.

FACT: Evolution science attempts to produce transitional fossils from lower primates ( ie monkeys and apes ).

Lack of the "missing link" and claims of racism led theorist recently to invent the common ancestory theory or belief.

The common ancestor theory still does not negate the racist claims that man evolved from some lower primate and that some humans are less evolved than others. Their most recent fail link attempt was the primate "Lucy".

QUOTE:
Dr. Yves Coppens, appearing on BBC-TV in 1982, stated that Lucy’s skull was like that of an ape.

Several scientists have decided that the bones of Lucy come from two different sources. Commenting on this, Peter Andrews, of the British Museum of Natural History, said this:

"To complicate matters further, some researchers believe that the afarensis sample [Lucy] is really a mixture of two separate species. The most convincing evidence for this is based on characteristics of the knee and elbow joints."
(Peter Andrews, "The Descent of Man", in New Scientist, 102:24 1984)

Regarding those knee joints, Owen Lovejoy, Richard Leakey’s highly qualified associate (an anatomist), declared at a 1979 lecture in the United States that a multivariate analysis of Lucy’s knee joints revealed her to be an ape.

So whether Lucy’s bones belong to one creature or two, they are both apes.
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP