Users Online Now:
1,530
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
410,772
Pageviews Today:
540,176
Threads Today:
174
Posts Today:
2,307
04:44 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV84MTQ3MzlfMzIzNTA5MjZfREMxRTE4Rg==] [quote:**ZetaMax**:MV84MTQ3MzlfMzIzNDgwODJfNzQ2RjdDQw==] [quote:Circuit Breaker:MV84MTQ3MzlfMzIzNDcxMzlfMkFDMThERUU=] [quote:Anonymous Coward 74444:MV84MTQ3MzlfMzIzNDQ5MzNfRDZCMjlBQTY=] Prove it. Show five posts, anywhere, where you give as much crap to the believers as you do to the debunkers. [/quote] +1000! [/quote] There is a BIG difference between taking a fundamentalist, unbending position, and having a "preference" for one side over another in a contentious dialogue. Essentially, while not "agreeing" with the "believers" (as debunkers like to label them), I do SYMPATHIZE with them. Their minds are much more OPEN than the "religious debunkers" on the whole. And yes - I did say RELIGIOUS. The debunker religion is predominantly MATERIALISTIC, and ethically - "SOCIAL DARWINISTIC". Debunkers deny almost everything that smacks of "spirit" - whether it be human or even animal. I'm always amazed at how rabidly a "debunker type" will attack "the hundredth monkey" phenomena or the notion of "pet telepathy" (where dogs have been demonstated to have an "uncanny" knack for predicting the the return of their owners) just as violently as they'll attack the notion of human psychic phenomena. They are JUST if not moreso FUNDAMENTALIST in their stance as the most staunch christian imaginable. Whereas ZetaTalk "believers" are much more open to all kinds of ideas - TOO open arguably. That often makes them gullible, but MOST do not stay in that condition long. With the rare exception of someone like FreeStore, almost all move on and others come in to take their place. I've seen NO debunkers to date soften their stance whatsoever. Yet in many ways, they are just as tragically silly - if not MORE SO, then the most pathetic of the "believers" that ever darken ZetaTalk's door. Furthermore, I for the most part *LIKE* the "believers", and DISLIKE the debunkers - mainly because of their insufferable arrogance and tactics. Menow is a distinct exception - he clearly accepts the reality of the spiritual realm, but apparently (if he's being sincere) is of the opinion that it's so DANGEROUS and hazardous, that it needs to be avoided at all costs - or at least left alone unless one is some kind of accomplished initiate - which means TRAINED and knowledgable of it's nature and pitfalls, which the "ZetaTalk believers" of course "lack". With such an outlook, he would look upon me as a kind of reckless irresponsible adolescent who is just as dangerous to human mental health, as a drunk teenager is to physical health - both his own and others. Though I don't think he'd mind so much if **I** fell victim to the worst of it's hazards. "I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy" is something I don't expect to hear from Menow if the subject were "moi". Ces la vie. Not everyone who considers themselves "spiritual" is "nice" - lest there wouldn't be "satanism", would there? And NO, I am not implying that Menow has ANYTHING to do with such leanings whatsoever - in fact he may be more horrified of it than all of us put together. Just keep in mind that "frightened" cats are more likely to BITE and scratch than "purr". And that "protective" aggression can manifest as behavior aimed at warning others off, as much as it would be to protect himself. That can explain his dour bedside manor as well. I don't think Menow is a "bad" person, but he sure is a HUMORLESS one. No arguing that. I do admit, to find it very amusing and entertaining when some debunkers attack Menow for his outlook. That just re-inforces my points above. [/quote] Your honor, I believe this successfully demonstrates the untruthfulness of ZT's self-styled 'Fence Sitter' claim. Thank you. [/quote]
Original Message
Debunker Talk Live Chat May 15
Feel free to quote
ANY
poster from those silly SOZT...EOZT threads etc etc.
Or just post your thoughts/opinions.
Open Discussion on Zetatalk; Bunkers; and it/their inability, over the last
Six
years to provide
ANY
truthful Facts and Knowledge to support the absurd
Failed
predictions of the "Candy Wrapper Aliens".
Let's see how long the Three "bunker" Amigos can bounce off each other in their little padded room over there on
Zetatalk Jive Turkey Chat!!
PS: If any of you debunkers want to meet in the GLP text/voice chat for some LIVE audio conversation we should set a day/time to meet up in one of the rooms to have a discussion etc.
Would find it a pleasure to converse with some of you guys. I mean there's a wealth of different subjects to talk about besides this silly zetatalk stuff.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>