Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,160 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 355,211
Pageviews Today: 572,189Threads Today: 165Posts Today: 2,855
06:12 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject CONTRADICTIONS ABOUT DINOSAUR BONES -- COME IN, COME IN, COME SEE SCIENCE SUFFER FOOT 'N' MOUTH SYNDROME.
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message FIRST THE FOOT:

"Even if carbon 14 were totally accurate and useable as far back in time as it goes, it only goes back for 40 thousands years. An evolutionist who believes the dinosaur is 70 million years old will not use carbon 14 on it because of this 40,000 year upper limit."
[link to www.parentcompany.com]

An evolutionist who believes the dinosaur is 70 million years old will not use carbon 14
An evolutionist who believes the dinosaur is 70 million years old will not use carbon 14


NOW THE MOUTH:

"In most cases, the fossilization process began when a plant or animal died and was quickly covered with sediments, usually at the bottom of a body of water. The loose sediments protected the bodily remains from the elements, bacteria and other forces that cause weathering and decay. This slowed the decaying process down so that some of the remains (in most cases, only hard material like bone or shell) were preserved for thousands of years."
[link to science.howstuffworks.com]

(in most cases, only hard material like bone or shell) were preserved for thousands of years."
(in most cases, only hard material like bone or shell) were preserved for thousands of years."


For the bones of dinosaurs to have survived they would have had to have been preserved, therewith, they contain carbon within that preservation even if they're a billion years old, ha,ha,ha, but evolutionist bypass carbon-14 testing GOD forbid they should show the World the results proving those bones to have carbon and DESTROYING their fairytale theory alleging that these Giants once walked the earth millions of years ago.

Thereafter there is always DNA, ha,ha,ha, you remember DNA? Have the surviving bone fragments tested to see if they really contain the blueprint of life. The preserved specimens would allow the DNA to still have its original code largely unaffected by time.

LOL -- science fiction is over!

bump lmao
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP