Saudi child Marriage Rampant !!!!!!!!

The depravity of Islam runs deep and denial by its followers is a sure sign ofbrainwash.

Let's hear from a Muslim on this. Where are they? In denial ashamed to admit.

child marriage: another name for legalized pedophilia.

da jooos
da jooos


da jooos are behind this

TALMUD LAW Rampant!!!!!!!!! You may fuck 2 year old Goys.

Islam is sick. Poor old Muslim guys can't talk to women. , so they take advantage of innocent children in the name of their "god" and "special" message from a "prophet".

How truly sad the Muhammedites are. They should call it:

Islamopedopheliaism.

I knew this would show up here eventually.
While I do not agree with child marriage, and cannot condone it, until fairly recently this was the norm throughout the 'civilised' world.

To those who criticize, also known as 'fucking do-gooders' (fdg).

Is everything in your country perfect? No more rape, no more incest, everything in your particular part of the world is just peachy, a regular paradise?

I know the answer to those questions is NO.

Then I have a suggestion for you.
Fix your own problems before you go meddling in others affairs. You a far more likely to make things worse by your interference. Those people will work it out eventually if you leave them be.

The USA and every other Nation on Earth need to get their own houses in order before they go "mandating" just what moral code any other Nation has placed itself under.

Many in the USA do not seem to realize that the "MORAL CODE" of the USA is a thing almost totally subject to the Majority Vote. By Majority Vote the poeple of the USA can change the entire US Constitution if they so decide. They could decide this nation shall have the MORAL COE of MOSES, or the TALMUD, or the WICCAN, or even the LaKota, or even the Law of Christ. It all depends on just how the vast Majority Believes What is Moral and What is Immoral.

The USA and all other nations as well need to stop being so fracking "Self-Righteous" and trying to force the People's of other Nations to live under Moral Codes that they themselves cannot perfectly serve.

Yes it is sick, but remember the peadophile scandal in the vatican, and with our world leaders. I think it comes down to the individual, not all muslims marry children.

You can even say Islam has an excuse to marry children, what excuse has the vatican got?

to the 2 posters above. i hope your children are raped. then you might get a fucking clue

The religion of love and peace means a piece of a 7 year old girl by some 70 year old perv.

What is to be considered "godly" totally and complete is figured from the poistion of just what God (gods, goddesses) one has chosen to serve.

What is godly to one that worships Isis is vastly different from what is godly to one that worships Kali. Contrast any two religions, no matter, the principle still holds.

So many that protest here are predominately taking up "Christian Morals" whether they want to admit it or not. But even in the Law of Christ and of the New Testament it is not instructed nor mandated that any certain and given age shall be deemed to be "the age of reason" or "the age of consent" or even that a man and a woman have the only and full right to determine and decide for themselve who they shall marry. Such understanding as Christians have is a derived understanding based on Prinicples and not on Laws.

Talmudic Morals are in fact different from Christian Morals, and Islamic Morals are in fact different from Christian Morals. The Morals of Shiva are different from Christian Morals, the Hinud Morals are different from Christian Morals. Get over it.

Protestant Christian Morals are different from Roman Catholic Christtian Morals.

To deem something is Moral or Immoral is only a statement of your own Belief System. Others have different belieft systesm

And the People of the USA cannot shove their 1st Amendment down the throats of those other Nations or their People's and still be said to be living by the Moral Set that Established the USA.

The reason for the "non-Establishment Clause" in the 1st Amendment is simply because a very certain set of Moral Codes were used before hand to Establish the US Constitution. And yet by the US Constituion, by way of Constitutional Amendment the "non-Establishment Clause" could be repeald and the Establishment of a State Religion for the USA put in its place.

Speaking as a Christian, where in the above is it in evidence that it was Rape, and not with her willing consent? Except to ask the question, "Can a nine year old even have consent to give?" And to answer such a question one has to make appeals to their own set of moral codes and/or understanding of Human Physical and Psychological Development (which constitute a set of THEORIES).

Did Aisha herself ever express or view that what had happened to here was Rape? All I ask for is, Where is the Evidence?

Reminds me of St. Augustine.

so you are a (fdg) for other (fdgs)? Thanks for the help.

You write that pedophelia was "normal until recently" in Islamic countries? 1300 years of this illness, And appears, according to the article, to be going strong.

Nice try Snackbar.

Good call OP......you should tell it to Woody Allen too! :(

it´s OK OP.

they fuel your fascist war machine.

so it´s OK.