I am a Chemtrail skeptic.

I find it interesting that I have no responses. I thought this might be an opportunity to put a well reasoned case forwards. Apparently not.

You just have to ask yourself, why weren't there any trails before? How come there in the skies now? Is our atmosphere changed to such a degree that contrials now linger for hours on end and form clouds?

Perhaps they can't

I was born in 1962. As long as I can remember planes have left contrails. We used to see them from the farm, and they lingered for hours.

Until recently I lived in a town call Nhulunbuy in the Northern Territory in Australia. Everymorning you can look up to 30,000ft and see a Qantas flight from Hong Kong passing overhead. The contrail is clear from the edge of the wings and it forms a long lasting cloud that breaks up into smaller bunches then disperses. I have seen no change in 47 years.

Last Edited by Headhigh on 04/16/2010 12:09 AM

I think its just airplanes.

I believe this little bit here about at much as I believe pigs can sprout wings and fly the coop.

dear cocksucker, you got more than ten fucking YEARS of data, websites, posts etc. on all this shit.

quit being a fucking stupid troll and STFU.

[youtube] [link to www.youtube.com]

Here you go.

youve got sheep shit for brains, mate. didnt your mamma ever tell you it aint nice to lie?

Me too.

YOU ARE SO FUCKING IDIOT !!!

Read every word in this link, and most your chemtrail questions will be answered. :)

Link to image events strange days strange skies site:

[link to imageevent.com]



.

Thanks for a genuine response. I will read the articles in full. May take me a few days. I will respond.

Roughly the same amount of evidence out there for shapeshifting reptilian aliens... doesn't make it true eh?

I wish somebody would at least answer the questions in the OP, but chemmies get so uptight if you ask questions... not a good sign.

That's the response you give him? He was asking for any information more or less and you say "ten fucking YEARS of data" yet fail to provide a single link?


Why is it whenever someone asks questions about this chemtrail conspiracy they get called a troll? When you google "chemtrails" you come across a bunch of poorly designed websites that spout out random crap without backing up anything, much like the posts here. You honestly have to dig under so much nonsensical trash that it's nearly impossible to find any evidence.

Thats a show that outlines conspiracy theories without actually validating or otherwise proving they exist. That is not evidence.

I agree, Tv shows are made to entertain and to present things in such a way that viewers will return to them. They consistently edit live data/footage in such a way as to present the view point they want.
However Aquarius 7 has presented a serious link, and I am wading my way through the pages on that link to see if there is any real evidence that would convince me to change my stance.

Excellent point, I've never seen this question answered or even acknowledged.

Do yourself a favor and quit being a DIPSHIT. Google chemtrails before wasting your time posting ignorant non sense.

start here. [link to www.carnicom.com]

I'm checking this out right now. So far I've hit a roadblock. Most of its explanation for the dangers of chemtrails comes from one interview with Dr Horowitz. Looking into him he seems like the type of guy to ask but he provides no proof or even a date for his claim that ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE is in the jet fuel. Now, he could have gotten that information from the EPA before it was removed from jet fuel since he doesn't mention when he started looking into contrails.

ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE was once in jet fuel and even standard gasoline but since has been removed for health reasons. I cannot find any other evidence that it's being used currently or that it's been found in our air recently.

The rest of the site builds on that ONCE SENTENCE or Horowitz, that didn't provide any facts other than "the EPA said" on an undisclosed date, and runs with it. All further evidence of it's existence in our air come from pictures with rainbow effects. Anyone can produce those pictures so we cannot take that as evidence. I live in a major city and watch the sky constantly and I've never seen such a thing [unless it just rained and its a normal rainbow].

Lots of facts on that site but they are presented poorly. Most of the evidence is weak. Still, it is an excellent place for someone to start with and actually build a solid case for chemtrails, assuming there is one.

Another hardcore believer who can't even provide ONE link to help? As a chemtrail conspiracy supporter you must know there are thousands of garbage websites with empty claims and only a few with factual data. Why not help those who are searching for the truth get to their destination?

. .

I will keep this thread in my Active Threads for a few days and watch for your comments on it ...



.

Oh look , silly shills.

Read, watch, and enter all links found here:

Thread: Obama's Science Advisor Suggests Use of Chemtrails

before you close your mind.....


(a one paragraph explanation of "chemtrails" is hardly possible)

Well you could do a search...this topic has been discussed millions of times...laziness

Chemtrails,or the posioning of the earth,is no longer important.

Only to those who believe that they are.......

(there is no substitute for intellagence)

Only an evil plan that will be..and will be nomore.

Skeptic.....there are no skeptics,only those witout a clue.

Hey asshole...

Even when they DID "last for hours", they always remained a pencil thin broken up line across the sky at VERY high altitude. They didn't billow out into these sky obscuring PLUMES, you deceitful cocksucker.