ULTRA HIDEOUS! Kitty and Puppy "CRUSH VIDEO" Considered "Free Speech"... | |
Olibow (OP) User ID: 769657 ![]() 05/13/2010 12:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please sign the petition to ban this travesty.... ~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~ From ED TV (1999) I feel that Ed (TV) is the apotheosis of a prevailing American syndrome. It used to be that someone became famous because they were special. Now people are considered special just for being famous. Fame, itself, is now a moral good in this country. It's its own virtue. |
Rex Kristos User ID: 90749 ![]() 05/13/2010 12:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ![]() So f#cking twisted... ![]() "And though I believe in the ineffable glory of God, and though I might have experienced the undeniable reality of the Deity, and though I may know the secrets of the ages, these do not fulfill the Love in my heart. But to Change and Be and Do and dissolve both the subject of my person and the object of my God into the fluency of Empirical Providence. The Way, the Truth, and the Life." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 701482 ![]() 05/13/2010 01:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | this shit is real? what a fucking twisted society there is nothing sexy about stiletto killing young animals..there is no power or dominance in that. is this ultimate humiliation for the teen girls doing this in the videos? are they forced to do it? who buys this shit? i am disgusted in this fucking pit of a world and humanity is becoming a slop hole of deviance for shock value. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 906238 ![]() 05/13/2010 01:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 967881 ![]() 05/13/2010 01:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Etheric Ray User ID: 697701 ![]() 05/13/2010 01:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 848506 ![]() 05/13/2010 01:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Even as much as 99% of us hate this kind of stuff, we still have to admit it IS free speech. They do have the right to say what they wish, but that doesn't mean we have to like it, support it, or expose more people to it. I hope they are crushed by a steam roller, and in their next life come back as sewer rats living in NYC. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 729515 ![]() 05/13/2010 01:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Olibow (OP) User ID: 769657 ![]() 05/13/2010 01:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it's no coincidence that since there's more illegals (not only from Mexico) that this type of "entertainment" along with sickening dogfighting is on the rise. These morons that watch this stuff are just subhuman as are the people that make them. They have no respect not only for rights of others, but for life. I don't want these barbarians to erase what good Americans have spent centuries trying to cultivate, which is individual rights and dignity. Now corporations are tearing all that we have worked so hard for apart for cheap labor and triple digit profits while people grow more desperate and mentally ill, and drugged. it's sick and not for the better. ~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~ From ED TV (1999) I feel that Ed (TV) is the apotheosis of a prevailing American syndrome. It used to be that someone became famous because they were special. Now people are considered special just for being famous. Fame, itself, is now a moral good in this country. It's its own virtue. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 894470 ![]() 05/13/2010 01:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't see why the 1st Amendment should be brought into this at all. It doesn't have anything to do with speech. Animal cruelty is a crime in every state, afaik, so they should be able to ban these films on that basis alone, but I'm no lawyer, it just seems logical. I mean, child porn and snuff films are illegal and I guess that someone could, and probably has, made the free speech argument there, but they are still illegal. And the law was supposedly deemed unconstitutional because it was too vague, but I looked up the law, and this is what it says: § 48. Depiction of animal cruelty (a) Creation, Sale, or Possession.— Whoever knowingly creates, sells, or possesses a depiction of animal cruelty with the intention of placing that depiction in interstate or foreign commerce for commercial gain, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. (b) Exception.— Subsection (a) does not apply to any depiction that has serious religious, political, scientific, educational, journalistic, historical, or artistic value. (c) Definitions.— In this section— (1) the term “depiction of animal cruelty” means any visual or auditory depiction, including any photograph, motion-picture film, video recording, electronic image, or sound recording of conduct in which a living animal is intentionally maimed, mutilated, tortured, wounded, or killed, if such conduct is illegal under Federal law or the law of the State in which the creation, sale, or possession takes place, regardless of whether the maiming, mutilation, torture, wounding, or killing took place in the State; and (2) the term “State” means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States. I don't see how the SCOTUS could consider that language vague. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 723449 ![]() 05/13/2010 04:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Hickory User ID: 937595 ![]() 05/13/2010 04:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 954745 ![]() 05/13/2010 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is beyond fucked up. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 894470I don't see why the 1st Amendment should be brought into this at all. It doesn't have anything to do with speech. Animal cruelty is a crime in every state, afaik, so they should be able to ban these films on that basis alone, but I'm no lawyer, it just seems logical. I mean, child porn and snuff films are illegal and I guess that someone could, and probably has, made the free speech argument there, but they are still illegal. And the law was supposedly deemed unconstitutional because it was too vague, but I looked up the law, and this is what it says: § 48. Depiction of animal cruelty (a) Creation, Sale, or Possession.— Whoever knowingly creates, sells, or possesses a depiction of animal cruelty with the intention of placing that depiction in interstate or foreign commerce for commercial gain, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. (b) Exception.— Subsection (a) does not apply to any depiction that has serious religious, political, scientific, educational, journalistic, historical, or artistic value. (c) Definitions.— In this section— (1) the term “depiction of animal cruelty” means any visual or auditory depiction, including any photograph, motion-picture film, video recording, electronic image, or sound recording of conduct in which a living animal is intentionally maimed, mutilated, tortured, wounded, or killed, if such conduct is illegal under Federal law or the law of the State in which the creation, sale, or possession takes place, regardless of whether the maiming, mutilation, torture, wounding, or killing took place in the State; and (2) the term “State” means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States. I don't see how the SCOTUS could consider that language vague. Hear hear !! Excellent work ! ![]() |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 751882 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Olibow That's your conservative Supreme Court for you? Don't forget that the "conservative" Rehnquist Supreme Court ruled that Anime depicting child sex was OK "because there was no proof that any child was harmed" in the creation of a cartoon. Conservatives are just plain old Con men! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 929725 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Returner User ID: 997 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
maryjaneshusband User ID: 923145 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 953637 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 929725 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 863478 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | IF ANYONE FINDS THIS SICK SHIT AMUSING THAN YOU DESERVE TO DIE. I HOPE ILL BE LUCKY ENOUGH ONE DAY TO SEE ONE OF THOSE TEEN CRUSH STARS GIRLS BLEEDING OUT IN THE STREET WITH HER INTESTINES ENTANGLED IN HER LEGS BEGGING FOR HELP. I JUST HOPE I HAVE A VIDEO CAMERA SO I CAN FILM IT. FUCK THEM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 969734 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 918857 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is beyond fucked up. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 894470I don't see why the 1st Amendment should be brought into this at all. It doesn't have anything to do with speech. Animal cruelty is a crime in every state, afaik, so they should be able to ban these films on that basis alone, but I'm no lawyer, it just seems logical. I mean, child porn and snuff films are illegal and I guess that someone could, and probably has, made the free speech argument there, but they are still illegal. And the law was supposedly deemed unconstitutional because it was too vague, but I looked up the law, and this is what it says: § 48. Depiction of animal cruelty (a) Creation, Sale, or Possession.— Whoever knowingly creates, sells, or possesses a depiction of animal cruelty with the intention of placing that depiction in interstate or foreign commerce for commercial gain, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. (b) Exception.— Subsection (a) does not apply to any depiction that has serious religious, political, scientific, educational, journalistic, historical, or artistic value. (c) Definitions.— In this section— (1) the term “depiction of animal cruelty” means any visual or auditory depiction, including any photograph, motion-picture film, video recording, electronic image, or sound recording of conduct in which a living animal is intentionally maimed, mutilated, tortured, wounded, or killed, if such conduct is illegal under Federal law or the law of the State in which the creation, sale, or possession takes place, regardless of whether the maiming, mutilation, torture, wounding, or killing took place in the State; and (2) the term “State” means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States. I don't see how the SCOTUS could consider that language vague. +100000000000000000000000000000 We should be allowed to execute people who produce and watch these videos on SITE!!!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 918857 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i have found my life calling, to hunt down these people and beat them to death. anybody wanna help? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 863478IF ANYONE FINDS THIS SICK SHIT AMUSING THAN YOU DESERVE TO DIE. I HOPE ILL BE LUCKY ENOUGH ONE DAY TO SEE ONE OF THOSE TEEN CRUSH STARS GIRLS BLEEDING OUT IN THE STREET WITH HER INTESTINES ENTANGLED IN HER LEGS BEGGING FOR HELP. I JUST HOPE I HAVE A VIDEO CAMERA SO I CAN FILM IT. FUCK THEM I WANNA FUCKING HELP! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 950542 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I can't watch it from what I'm hearing. I don't like PETA, but if they get get a farmer into trouble for running over a mouse with his tracter stuff (accidently), surely they can get these people. I never thought I would say this, but someone contact PETA! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 732706 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 918857 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 732706 Unfortunately. Yes. |
Astronut![]() Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 634208 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:43 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I can't watch it from what I'm hearing. Quoting: D'LightI don't like PETA, but if they get get a farmer into trouble for running over a mouse with his tracter stuff (accidently), surely they can get these people. I never thought I would say this, but someone contact PETA! PETA funds the legal defense and does public relations for terrorists who try to kill people like me, so I won't support them, even over this. They deserve to be in jail as much as the sickos who made these videos. ![]() |
Lil Miss Trouble User ID: 601435 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Even as much as 99% of us hate this kind of stuff, we still have to admit it IS free speech. They do have the right to say what they wish, but that doesn't mean we have to like it, support it, or expose more people to it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 848506I hope they are crushed by a steam roller, and in their next life come back as sewer rats living in NYC. Animal cruelty is NOT free speach |
Tazzz User ID: 849986 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Lover of ALMIGHTY GOD User ID: 954680 ![]() 05/13/2010 05:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Even as much as 99% of us hate this kind of stuff, we still have to admit it IS free speech. They do have the right to say what they wish, but that doesn't mean we have to like it, support it, or expose more people to it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 848506I hope they are crushed by a steam roller, and in their next life come back as sewer rats living in NYC. ANIMAL CRUELTY IS NOT PROTECTED UNDER "FREE SPEECH." THESE PEOPLE BELONG IN PRISON. PERMANENTLY. END OF STORY. |